Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Metallic Solids02:37

Metallic Solids

Metallic solids such as crystals of copper, aluminum, and iron are formed by metal atoms. The structure of metallic crystals is often described as a uniform distribution of atomic nuclei within a “sea” of delocalized electrons. The atoms within such a metallic solid are held together by a unique force known as metallic bonding that gives rise to many useful and varied bulk properties.
All metallic solids exhibit high thermal and electrical conductivity, metallic luster, and malleability. Many...
Electric Field at the Surface of a Conductor01:26

Electric Field at the Surface of a Conductor

Consider a conductor in electrostatic equilibrium. The net electric field inside a conductor vanishes, and extra charges on the conductor reside on its outer surface, regardless of where they originate.
In the 19th century, Michael Faraday conducted the famous ice pail experiment to prove that the charges always reside on the surface of a conductor. The experimental set-up consists of a conducting uncharged container mounted on an insulating stand. The outer surface of the container is...
Theory of Metallic Conduction01:17

Theory of Metallic Conduction

The conduction of free electrons inside a conductor is best described by quantum mechanics. However, a classical model makes predictions close to the results of quantum mechanics. It is called the theory of metallic conduction.
In this theory, Newton's second law of motion is used to determine the acceleration of an electron in the presence of an applied electric field. Then, its velocity is expressed via this acceleration.
An electron moves through the crystal, containing positive ions,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Leaky surface electromagnetic waves on a high-index dielectric grating.

Optics letters·2016
Same author

Controlling quantum-dot light absorption and emission by a surface-plasmon field.

Optics express·2014
Same author

Numerical solutions of the Rayleigh equations for the scattering of light from a two-dimensional randomly rough perfectly conducting surface.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2014
Same author

Surface plasmon polariton Wannier-Stark ladder.

Optics letters·2014
Same author

Satellite peaks in the scattering of light from the two-dimensional randomly rough surface of a dielectric film on a planar metal surface.

Optics express·2012
Same author

Enhanced backscattering from a free-standing dielectric film.

Applied optics·2010

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Measurement of Scattering Nonlinearities from a Single Plasmonic Nanoparticle
15:06

Measurement of Scattering Nonlinearities from a Single Plasmonic Nanoparticle

Published on: January 3, 2016

Coherent scattering by one-dimensional randomly rough metallic surfaces.

E I Chaikina, A G Navarrete, E R Méndez

    Applied Optics
    |February 13, 2008
    PubMed
    Summary

    Phase-perturbation theory offers broader applicability for calculating reflectivity on 1D metallic randomly rough surfaces compared to other perturbation theories and the Kirchhoff approximation, based on experimental and numerical validation.

    More Related Videos

    Scattering And Absorption of Light in Planetary Regoliths
    11:34

    Scattering And Absorption of Light in Planetary Regoliths

    Published on: July 1, 2019

    High Resolution Physical Characterization of Single Metallic Nanoparticles
    09:56

    High Resolution Physical Characterization of Single Metallic Nanoparticles

    Published on: June 28, 2019

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jul 7, 2026

    Measurement of Scattering Nonlinearities from a Single Plasmonic Nanoparticle
    15:06

    Measurement of Scattering Nonlinearities from a Single Plasmonic Nanoparticle

    Published on: January 3, 2016

    Scattering And Absorption of Light in Planetary Regoliths
    11:34

    Scattering And Absorption of Light in Planetary Regoliths

    Published on: July 1, 2019

    High Resolution Physical Characterization of Single Metallic Nanoparticles
    09:56

    High Resolution Physical Characterization of Single Metallic Nanoparticles

    Published on: June 28, 2019

    Area of Science:

    • Optics and Photonics
    • Materials Science
    • Surface Science

    Background:

    • Calculating the reflectivity of metallic surfaces with random roughness is crucial for understanding light-matter interactions.
    • Existing theoretical models, including perturbation theories and the Kirchhoff approximation, have limitations in accurately predicting reflectivity for various surface characteristics.
    • Experimental validation is essential to assess the performance of these theoretical techniques.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To critically evaluate and compare the applicability of different theoretical techniques for calculating the reflectivity of one-dimensional (1D) metallic randomly rough surfaces.
    • To determine which theoretical approach provides the most accurate predictions across a range of surface correlation lengths relative to infrared wavelengths.
    • To validate theoretical models against rigorous numerical simulations and experimental measurements.

    Main Methods:

    • Fabrication of metallic surfaces on photoresist, approximating Gaussian-correlated, Gaussian random processes.
    • Experimental measurement of surface profiles and reflectivity in the infrared spectrum.
    • Comparison of experimental and rigorous numerical results with predictions from three perturbation theories and the Kirchhoff approximation.
    • Analysis of surface correlation lengths, ranging from one-third to three times the employed infrared wavelengths.

    Main Results:

    • The phase-perturbation theory demonstrated wider applicability compared to other perturbation theories.
    • The Kirchhoff approximation showed limitations in accurately predicting reflectivity for the studied surfaces.
    • Experimental and numerical data provided a robust basis for evaluating the theoretical models.
    • The performance of each theory was assessed across varying surface roughness and correlation lengths.

    Conclusions:

    • Phase-perturbation theory is a more versatile and accurate method for calculating reflectivity on 1D metallic randomly rough surfaces within the studied parameter space.
    • The Kirchhoff approximation is less suitable for surfaces with characteristics similar to those investigated.
    • This study provides valuable insights for selecting appropriate theoretical models in optical and materials science applications involving rough metallic surfaces.