Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

Introduction to Epidemiology

Introduction to Epidemiology

Epidemiology, known as the cornerstone of public health, involves studying the distribution and determinants of health-related events in defined populations and applying these insights to control health issues. This is essential for understanding how diseases spread, identifying populations at greater risk, and implementing measures to control or prevent outbreaks. Epidemiology addresses not only infectious diseases but also non-communicable conditions like cancer and cardiovascular disease,...

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.

Kaplan-Meier Approach

Kaplan-Meier Approach

The Kaplan-Meier estimator is a non-parametric method used to estimate the survival function from time-to-event data. In medical research, it is frequently employed to measure the proportion of patients surviving for a certain period after treatment. This estimator is fundamental in analyzing time-to-event data, making it indispensable in clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and reliability engineering. By estimating survival probabilities, researchers can evaluate treatment effectiveness,...

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Effects of breast cancer risk factors on the tumor microenvironment: a morphological deep-learning analysis of three prospective cohorts.

NPJ breast cancer·2026

Same author

Healthcare contact days in cancer survivors relative to those with no cancer history.

Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer·2026

Same author

The analysis of cancer screening trials in which the outcome is the incidence of late-stage disease.

European journal of epidemiology·2026

Same author

Histology-Derived Signatures Predict Recurrence Risk and Chemotherapy Benefit in Randomized Trials of Early Breast Cancer.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026

Same author

Associations of smoking with the risk of second smoking-associated primary cancer among adults with a history of cancer.

Cancer epidemiology·2026

Same author

Clinicopathologic and molecular predictors of survival in BRCA-deficient tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma.

Nature communications·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Interview-based case-control studies of screening efficacy.

Noel S Weiss¹, Clara Bodelon

¹Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. nweiss@u.washington.edu

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)

|February 16, 2008

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study reviews interview methods for cancer screening efficacy research. It provides strategies to improve the accuracy of studies involving interviews with cancer patients and controls.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

Oncology
Epidemiology
Biostatistics

Background:

Cancer screening efficacy studies often require interviews with patients.
Interviews are conducted with individuals diagnosed with cancer and control groups.
Ethical considerations and data validity are paramount in such research.

Purpose of the Study:

To review existing interview-based approaches in cancer screening efficacy studies.
To outline the specific objectives achievable with each interview methodology.
To propose enhancements for improving the validity of these research designs.

Main Methods:

Literature review of interview-based methodologies in cancer screening research.
Analysis of the utility and application of different interview techniques.
Synthesis of best practices for data collection and participant engagement.

Main Results:

Identification of various interview strategies employed in cancer screening research.
Assessment of the strengths and limitations of each approach.
Development of a framework for enhancing study validity.

Conclusions:

Interview-based approaches are crucial for cancer screening efficacy research.
Methodological rigor is essential for reliable findings.
Implementing suggested strategies can improve the overall quality and validity of such studies.