Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
Published on: September 27, 2020
Optimising self-regulated study: the benefits - and costs - of dropping flashcards
1Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1563, USA. nkornell@psych.ucla.edu
Abstract:
Self-regulation of study activities is a constant in the lives of students - who must decide what to study, when to study, how long to study, and by what method to study. We investigated self-regulation in the context of a common study method: flashcards. In four experiments we examined the basis and effectiveness of a metacognitive strategy adopted almost universally by students: setting aside (dropping) items they think they know. Dropping has a compelling logic - it creates additional opportunities to study undropped items - but it rests on two shaky foundations: students' metacognitive monitoring and the value they assign to further study. In fact, being allowed to drop flashcards had small but consistently negative effects on learning. The results suggest that the effectiveness of self-regulated study depends on both the accuracy of metacognitive monitoring and the learner's understanding, or lack thereof, of how people learn.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Metacognition
Self-Regulation
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Chunking
The principle behind chunking is...
Chunking and Rehearsal in Sensory Memory
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping

