Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Optimizing the difference gel electrophoresis (DIGE) technology.

David B Friedman1, Kathryn S Lilley

  • 1Proteomics Laboratory, Mass Spectrometry Research Center, Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.

Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.)
|February 22, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The spatial proteome of the Plasmodium falciparum schizont illuminates the composition and evolutionary trajectories of its organelles.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Dynamic subcellular proteomics identifies regulators of adipocyte insulin action.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Subcellular localization as a driver of protein function.

Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology·2026
Same author

Functional characterisation of tumour suppressor PDCD4 reveals previously undisclosed role in the control of cell adhesion.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same author

Semi-supervised Bayesian integration of multiple spatial proteomics datasets.

PLoS computational biology·2025
Same author

The distinct roles of genome, methylation, transcription, and translation on protein expression in Arabidopsis thaliana resolve the Central Dogma's information flow.

Genome biology·2025
Same journal

Mapping the 3D Chromosome Organization of a Biosynthetic Gene Cluster by Capture Hi-C (CHi-C).

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same journal

Mapping the 3D Chromosome Organization of Streptomyces by Hi-C.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same journal

CUT&Tag Epigenomic Profiling of Biosynthetic Gene Clusters in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same journal

Rhizobium rhizogenes-Mediated Hairy Root Transformation Protocol for Lotus japonicus and Other Legumes.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same journal

Characterization of Bioactive Saponins from Sea Cucumbers.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same journal

Methods for Functional Validation of Terpenoid Metabolic Clusters in Nicotiana benthamiana and Aspergillus oryzae.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
See all related articles

Difference gel electrophoresis (DIGE) offers precise quantitative proteomics by minimizing technical variation. This method enhances statistical confidence in analyzing clinical samples for disease state discovery.

Area of Science:

  • Proteomics
  • Biochemistry
  • Analytical Chemistry

Background:

  • Proteomics research requires accurate quantification of protein expression levels.
  • Traditional 2D gel electrophoresis faces challenges with technical variability and limited dynamic range.
  • Differential display proteomics aims to identify proteins that change in abundance under different conditions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To detail the design and implementation of Difference Gel Electrophoresis (DIGE) methodology.
  • To highlight DIGE's capability for quantitative analysis in 2D gel electrophoresis.
  • To demonstrate DIGE's utility in analyzing complex biological samples, particularly clinical samples.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizes spectrally resolvable fluorescent dyes (Cy2, Cy3, Cy5) for sample multiplexing.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Employs an internal standard methodology for enhanced statistical confidence.
  • Incorporates multivariate statistical analyses to assess global variation in independent samples.
  • Focuses on minimal CyDye chemistry with a pooled-sample internal standard.

    • Main Results:

    • Achieves low technical variation through sample multiplexing and internal standardization.
    • Enables robust analysis of replicate samples across multiple experimental conditions.
    • Facilitates the accommodation of sufficient biological replicates to manage interpersonal variation in clinical samples.
    • Effectively filters technical and normal biological variation to focus on disease-specific changes.

    Conclusions:

    • DIGE technology provides a powerful quantitative tool for differential display proteomics.
    • The methodology offers high statistical confidence for analyzing complex and variable biological samples.
    • DIGE is instrumental in identifying underlying variations indicative of different disease states.