Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026
Application of Bedside Lower Extremity Rehabilitation Robots in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Published on: November 28, 2025
No difference between wearing a night splint and standing on a tilt table in preventing ankle contracture early after
Wendy Robinson1, Robyn Smith, Ohnmar Aung
1Bankstown/Lidcombe Hospital, Bankstown, NSW, 2200, Australia. wendy.robinson@sswahs.nsw.gov.au
Question:
Is wearing a night splint as effective as standing on a tilt table in preventing ankle dorsiflexion contracture and promoting the ability to stand up early after stroke?
Design:
Randomised trial with concealed allocation, assessor blinding, and intention-to-treat analysis.
Participants:
30 patients undergoing rehabilitation who were not yet walking and within three weeks of their first stroke.
Intervention:
For four weeks, one group wore a splint with the affected ankle at plantargrade, 7 nights per week, while the other group stood on a tilt table for 30 min with the ankle at maximum dorsiflexion, 5 times per week. This was followed by a period of no intervention for six weeks. Both groups received inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation emphasising mobility.
Outcome Measures:
The primary outcome was contracture measured as maximum passive ankle dorsiflexion.
Results:
The night splint group had the same amount of ankle dorsiflexion as the tilt table group by Week 4 (mean difference 1 deg, 95% CI -5 to 7), and by Week 10 (mean difference 3.5 deg, 95% CI -3 to 10).
Conclusion:
When added to early rehabilitation, wearing a night splint on the affected ankle in stroke patients appears to be as effective as standing on a tilt table in preventing contracture at the ankle. However, since there was no control group, the prevention of contracture may have been due to other factors.