Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Non-Verbal Cues01:29

Non-Verbal Cues

Non-verbal communication extends beyond gestures and facial expressions to include vocal elements known as paralanguage. Paralanguage consists of non-verbal vocal cues such as pitch, loudness, speech rate, pauses, and non-verbal vocalizations like laughter, sighs, and moans. These elements not only accompany speech but also provide critical emotional and contextual information.The Role of Paralanguage in CommunicationParalanguage adds depth to spoken language by conveying emotions and...
Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance01:20

Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance

Frustration occurs when people are obstructed or prevented from achieving a desired goal or fulfilling a perceived need. For example, when someone's input is ignored in a discussion, it can lead to feelings of frustration. Conflict, however, arises from opposing interests, goals, or actions. Conflicts can take various forms based on the nature of these opposing desires or goals.
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable options,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Temporal distortion for angry faces: Testing visual attention and action preparation accounts.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2023
Same author

When men are wonderful: A larger happy face facilitation effect for male (vs. female) faces for male participants.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2023
Same author

No need to collect more data: ex-Gaussian modelling of existing data (Craig & Lipp, 2018) reveals an interactive effect of face race and face sex on speeded expression recognition.

Cognition & emotion·2022
Same author

Analyzing facial expression decision times: Reaction time distribution matters.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2022
Same author

Verbal Descriptions of Cue Direction Affect Object Desirability.

Frontiers in psychology·2019
Same author

Increased temporal sensitivity for threat: A Bayesian generalized linear mixed modeling approach.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing
07:48

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing

Published on: April 4, 2025

Orienting to counterpredictive gaze and arrow cues.

Jason Tipples1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Hull, Hull, England. j.tipples@hull.ac.uk

Perception & Psychophysics
|March 1, 2008
PubMed
Summary

Individual differences in voluntary attention control influence involuntary orienting to symbolic cues like arrows and eye gaze. This suggests voluntary control impacts automatic attention shifts, unlike abrupt-onset cues.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Attention Studies

Background:

  • Involuntary orienting, or automatic attention shifts, is typically studied using abrupt-onset cues.
  • Previous research suggested symbolic cues like arrows do not elicit involuntary orienting.
  • The role of individual differences in voluntary attentional control on involuntary orienting remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether symbolic cues (arrow, eye gaze) can elicit involuntary orienting.
  • To examine the relationship between individual differences in voluntary attentional control and involuntary orienting.
  • To compare orienting responses to symbolic cues versus abrupt-onset cues.

Main Methods:

  • Experiments using counterpredictive arrow, eye gaze, and abrupt-onset cues.

More Related Videos

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing
07:48

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing

Published on: April 4, 2025

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

  • Measurement of involuntary orienting effects.
  • Assessment of individual differences in voluntary attentional control and cue utilization.

    • Main Results:

    • Involuntary orienting effects were observed for arrow cues, contradicting previous findings.
    • Both eye gaze and arrow cues elicited involuntary orienting effects.
    • Stronger involuntary orienting was associated with better voluntary attentional control and cue reorientation ability.
    • Orienting to abrupt-onset cues showed no correlation with individual differences in attentional control.

    Conclusions:

    • Symbolic cues (eye gaze, arrows) can trigger both involuntary and voluntary orienting responses.
    • Involuntary orienting to symbolic cues is modulated by an individual's capacity for voluntary attentional control.
    • Attentional control mechanisms may influence automatic attention shifts, even for symbolic stimuli.