Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

08:52
Software-Assisted Quantitative Measurement of Osteoarthritic Subchondral Bone Thickness
Published on: March 18, 2022
The inter-observer reproducibility of Shafer's sign
1Department of Ophthalmology, Ipswich Hospital, Ipswich, Suffolk, UK. farhanqureshi101@hotmail.com
Eye (London, England)
|March 1, 2008
Summary
Shafer's sign, a marker for retinal breaks, showed moderate agreement between consultants and senior house officers, but fair agreement with opticians. This highlights the impact of training on the reliability of Shafer's sign assessment.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Retinal Surgery
- Diagnostic Accuracy
Background:
- Shafer's sign, characterized by pigment cells in the anterior vitreous, is a known indicator of retinal breaks.
- Assessing the reproducibility of Shafer's sign among different ophthalmic professionals is crucial for clinical practice.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the inter-observer reliability of Shafer's sign detection across varying levels of ophthalmic staff.
- To determine the diagnostic accuracy of Shafer's sign compared to confirmed retinal breaks.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 47 patients were examined for Shafer's sign by a consultant vitreo-retinal surgeon, a senior house officer (SHO), and an optician.
- Cohen's kappa statistic was used to quantify agreement between examiners and between sign assessment and the presence of retinal tears.
- Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for consultant assessment against fundoscopy findings.
Main Results:
- Moderate agreement (kappa = 0.55) was observed between consultant and SHO assessments of Shafer's sign.
- Fair agreement (kappa = 0.28) was found between consultant and optician assessments.
- Consultant assessment demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity 93.8%, specificity 93.5%) with good agreement (kappa = 0.86) with the presence of retinal breaks.
Conclusions:
- The reliability of Shafer's sign assessment is influenced by the examiner's training and experience.
- While consultants show high accuracy, caution is advised regarding over-reliance on Shafer's sign, especially by less experienced staff.
Related Concept Videos
Sign Test for Matched Pairs
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in value between...
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in value between...
McNemar's Test
McNemar's Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there is a significant difference in proportions between two related groups when the outcome is binary (e.g., yes/no, success/failure). It is beneficial when we have paired data, such as pre-test/post-test designs, where the same subjects are measured under two different conditions. The test is named after the statistician Quinn McNemar, who introduced it in 1947. It is commonly used in situations where subjects are...
