Ethical, legal, and social concerns about expanded newborn screening: fragile X syndrome as a prototype for emerging
Donald B Bailey1, Debra Skinner, Arlene M Davis
1RTI International, 3040 Cornwallis Rd, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194, USA. dbailey@rti.org
Insights
Newborn screening for fragile X syndrome and other conditions presents ethical challenges. Careful consideration of informed consent, genetic counseling capacity, and potential discrimination is crucial for responsible implementation.
Area of Science:
- Medical Genetics
- Bioethics
- Public Health Policy
Background:
- Advancements in technology enable screening for conditions like fragile X syndrome beyond current newborn screening guidelines.
- Screening for fragile X syndrome, an untreatable condition, raises significant ethical, legal, and social concerns.
- Existing newborn screening programs face challenges that could be exacerbated by expanded screening protocols.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify and analyze the broad ethical, legal, and social concerns associated with expanding newborn screening to include conditions like fragile X syndrome.
- To propose recommendations for addressing the identified concerns and developing a robust newborn screening system.
- To foster public and expert dialogue on the aims and implementation of newborn screening.
Main Methods:
- Review of potential ethical, legal, and social implications of screening for fragile X syndrome and similar conditions.
- Identification of challenges related to informed consent, parental anxiety, and unintended findings.
- Development of recommendations for a national research network, decision-making models, and public engagement.
Main Results:
- Expanded screening raises concerns about parental anxiety, informed consent burdens, and identification of phenotypically normal children.
- Potential issues include overwhelming genetic counseling resources, stigmatization, discrimination, and implications for extended family members.
- Discrepancies in how men and women experience genetic risk and testing decisions may be heightened.
Conclusions:
- A national newborn screening research network and improved informed decision-making models are recommended.
- Development of resources for understanding and communicating genetic information is essential.
- Public engagement is vital to define the goals and characteristics of an effective newborn screening system.
Abstract:
Technology will make it possible to screen for fragile X syndrome and other conditions that do not meet current guidelines for routine newborn screening. This possibility evokes at least 8 broad ethical, legal, and social concerns: (1) early identification of fragile X syndrome, an "untreatable" condition, could lead to heightened anxiety about parenting, oversensitivity to development, alterations in parenting, or disrupted bonding; (2) because fragile X syndrome screening should be voluntary, informed consent could overwhelm parents with information, significantly burden hospitals, and reduce participation in the core screening program; (3) screening will identify some children who are or appear to be phenotypically normal; (4) screening might identify children with other conditions not originally targeted for screening; (5) screening could overwhelm an already limited capacity for genetic counseling and comprehensive care; (6) screening for fragile X syndrome, especially if carrier status is disclosed, increases the likelihood of negative self-concept, societal stigmatization, and insurance or employment discrimination; (7) screening will suggest risk in extended family members, raising ethical and legal issues (because they never consented to screening) and creating a communication burden for parents or expanding the scope of physician responsibility; and (8) screening for fragile X syndrome could heighten discrepancies in how men and women experience genetic risk or decide about testing. To address these concerns we recommend a national newborn screening research network; the development of models for informed decision-making; materials and approaches for helping families understand genetic information and communicating it to others; a national forum to address carrier testing and the disclosure of secondary or incidental findings; and public engagement of scientists, policy makers, ethicists, practitioners, and other citizens to discuss the desired aims of newborn screening and the characteristics of a system needed to achieve those aims.
More Related Videos
10:59Generation and Characterization of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-derived Astrocytes Lacking Fragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein
Published on: June 6, 2025
10:58TMS: Using the Theta-Burst Protocol to Explore Mechanism of Plasticity in Individuals with Fragile X Syndrome and Autism
Published on: December 28, 2010
Related Concept Videos
CRISPR
Genetic Screens
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which result in visible changes...
What is Genetic Engineering?
Autism Spectrum Disorder
These core symptoms manifest differently among individuals, ranging from mild to severe. The disorder's complexity extends beyond its clinical presentation, encompassing a diverse range of biological, cognitive, and sociocultural influences.
Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
