Ethical, legal, and social concerns about expanded newborn screening: fragile X syndrome as a prototype for emerging

Donald B Bailey1, Debra Skinner, Arlene M Davis

  • 1RTI International, 3040 Cornwallis Rd, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194, USA. dbailey@rti.org

Pediatrics
|March 4, 2008
PubMed

Insights

Newborn screening for fragile X syndrome and other conditions presents ethical challenges. Careful consideration of informed consent, genetic counseling capacity, and potential discrimination is crucial for responsible implementation.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Genetics
  • Bioethics
  • Public Health Policy

Background:

  • Advancements in technology enable screening for conditions like fragile X syndrome beyond current newborn screening guidelines.
  • Screening for fragile X syndrome, an untreatable condition, raises significant ethical, legal, and social concerns.
  • Existing newborn screening programs face challenges that could be exacerbated by expanded screening protocols.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and analyze the broad ethical, legal, and social concerns associated with expanding newborn screening to include conditions like fragile X syndrome.
  • To propose recommendations for addressing the identified concerns and developing a robust newborn screening system.
  • To foster public and expert dialogue on the aims and implementation of newborn screening.

Main Methods:

  • Review of potential ethical, legal, and social implications of screening for fragile X syndrome and similar conditions.
  • Identification of challenges related to informed consent, parental anxiety, and unintended findings.
  • Development of recommendations for a national research network, decision-making models, and public engagement.

Main Results:

  • Expanded screening raises concerns about parental anxiety, informed consent burdens, and identification of phenotypically normal children.
  • Potential issues include overwhelming genetic counseling resources, stigmatization, discrimination, and implications for extended family members.
  • Discrepancies in how men and women experience genetic risk and testing decisions may be heightened.

Conclusions:

  • A national newborn screening research network and improved informed decision-making models are recommended.
  • Development of resources for understanding and communicating genetic information is essential.
  • Public engagement is vital to define the goals and characteristics of an effective newborn screening system.

Related Concept Videos

CRISPR01:59

CRISPR

Genome editing technologies allow scientists to modify an organism’s DNA via the addition, removal, or rearrangement of genetic material at specific genomic locations. These types of techniques could potentially be used to cure genetic disorders such as hemophilia and sickle cell anemia. One popular and widely used DNA-editing research tool that could lead to safe and effective cures for genetic disorders is the CRISPR-Cas9 system. CRISPR-Cas9 stands for Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short...
Genetic Screens02:46

Genetic Screens

Genetic screens are tools used to identify genes and mutations responsible for phenotypes of interest. Genetic screens help identify individuals or a group of people at risk of developing  genetic diseases and help them with early intervention, targeted therapy, and reproductive options.
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which result in visible changes...
What is Genetic Engineering?00:49

What is Genetic Engineering?

Overview