Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Across-notation automatic numerical processing.

Dana Ganor-Stern1, Joseph Tzelgov

  • 1Achva Academic College, Shikmim, Israel. danaga@bgu.ac.il

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|March 5, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correction: Practice makes better? The influence of increased practice on task conflict in the Stroop task.

Memory & cognition·2025
Same author

Practice makes better? The influence of increased practice on task conflict in the Stroop task.

Memory & cognition·2025
Same author

Walking to a number: is there affective involvement in generating the SNARC effect in numerical cognition?

Frontiers in psychology·2024
Same author

How can caching explain automaticity?

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2022
Same author

Neural Correlates of Numerical Estimation: The Role of Strategy Use.

Brain sciences·2022
Same author

The approximate number system represents rational numbers: The special case of an empty set.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2021
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

The role of statistical learning in attentional guidance during search through naturalistic scenes.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Representing objects and features in long-term memory: A case for direct feature-feature binding.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Crossmodal correspondences influence adaptation during rule-based category learning of objects.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
See all related articles

Arabic speakers automatically process numerical magnitude across different symbol systems (Arabic and Indian). This suggests a common abstract representation for numbers, regardless of notation.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Numerical Cognition
  • Cross-Cultural Psychology

Background:

  • Understanding how humans process numbers is crucial for cognitive science.
  • Investigating numerical processing across different notations can reveal underlying cognitive mechanisms.
  • Previous models suggest abstract representations of numerical magnitude.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate automatic numerical processing across different notations (Arabic and Indian).
  • To test if numerical magnitude is processed automatically even when notations differ.
  • To examine the validity of abstract representation models in cross-notation numerical cognition.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized size comparison and same-different paradigms with Arabic speakers.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Presented number pairs in same (Arabic/Indian) and different (Arabic-Indian) notations.
  • Participants performed tasks focused on physical dimensions while numerical information was varied.
  • Main Results:

    • Evidence of automatic processing of numerical magnitude for number pairs in different notations.
    • Participants' performance indicated that irrelevant numerical information was processed.
    • Findings were consistent across both size comparison and same-different paradigms.

    Conclusions:

    • Numbers in different notations are automatically translated into a common magnitude representation.
    • Supports abstract representation models of numerical cognition, such as McCloskey's (1992) model.
    • Demonstrates the brain's capacity for abstract numerical processing irrespective of symbolic form.