Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Learning from feedback: exactingness and incentives.

R M Hogarth1, B J Gibbs, C R McKenzie

  • 1Graduate School of Business, Center for Decision Research, University of Chicago, Illinois 60637.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|July 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

From lab to ocean: bridging swimming energetics and wild movements to understand red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) behavior in a tidal estuary.

The Journal of experimental biology·2026
Same author

The Influence of Optimal Handheld Load on the Technical Ability to Apply Ground Reaction Forces during Horizontal Jumping in Female Netball Players.

International journal of sports medicine·2015
Same author

Dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitors and pancreatic cancer: a cohort study.

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism·2014
Same author

Narrow-linewidth master-oscillator power amplifier based on a semiconductor tapered amplifier.

Applied optics·2008
Same author

Relation between confidence in yes-no and forced-choice tasks.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2001
Same author

The psychological side of Hempel's paradox of confirmation.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2000

Learning how decision-making is affected by exactingness and incentives is key. Performance improves with exactingness when negative effects are removed, showing its complex role in learning.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Science
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Understanding how environmental factors influence decision-making is crucial for optimizing learning.
  • Exactingness, the degree to which suboptimal choices are penalized, is a key environmental characteristic.
  • Incentives are often used to motivate performance, but their interaction with environmental demands is not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of exactingness on learning a repetitive decision-making task.
  • To examine the moderating role of incentives on the relationship between exactingness and performance.
  • To explore conditions under which exactingness may or may not negatively impact performance.

Main Methods:

  • Five experiments were conducted using a repetitive decision-making task.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Varying levels of exactingness (punishment for deviations from optimal decisions) were manipulated.
  • Incentives were introduced, and their interaction with exactingness was analyzed.

    • Main Results:

    • Task performance exhibited an inverted-U shaped relationship with exactingness.
    • Incentives improved performance in lenient environments but not in exacting ones.
    • The interaction between incentives and exactingness was absent when incentive structures lacked sharp performance discrimination.
    • When the detrimental effects of exactingness were mitigated, performance increased with higher exactingness.

    Conclusions:

    • Exactingness has a complex, non-monotonic effect on decision-making performance.
    • The efficacy of incentives is contingent on the level of environmental exactingness.
    • Careful design of incentive structures is necessary to leverage their benefits in demanding environments.