Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Enhancing the ecological risk assessment process.

Virginia H Dale1, Gregory R Biddinger, Michael C Newman

  • 1Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6036, USA. dalevh@ornl.gov

Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
|March 8, 2008
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Unintentional Disinformation: A Cautionary Tale for Scientific Publishing.

Environmental toxicology and chemistry·2026
Same author

Distinguishing Natural and Anthropogenic stressors at a Groundwater-Surface Water Interface Using a Weight-of-Evidence Framework.

Integrated environmental assessment and management·2026
Same author

A systematic map of methods for assessing societal benefits of Earth science information.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Potential Interactions Between Birds And Floating Photovoltaic Solar Energy: Spatially Informed Species Vulnerabilities, Techno-Ecological Risks, And Sustainability Trade-Offs.

Environmental science & technology·2025
Same author

A critical perspective on the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry's adherence to founding principles-opportunities for the future.

Environmental toxicology and chemistry·2025
Same author

Probabilistic injury assessment and quantification for natural resource damage assessment according to Bayesian networks: a case study of the polychlorinated biphenyl-contaminated Mississinewa River basin.

Integrated environmental assessment and management·2025
Same journal

Boring into groundwater impact predictions of hardrock mines in Canada reveals inconsistent modelling timelines, monitoring plans, and consideration of climate change.

Integrated environmental assessment and management·2026
Same journal

Brazilian soil conditions in ecotoxicological tests: do international protocols represent the reality?

Integrated environmental assessment and management·2026
Same journal

Correction to: Evaluation of pesticide residues in cereals at BBCH 30-39 to inform the wild mammals risk assessment (medium herbivorous scenario).

Integrated environmental assessment and management·2026
Same journal

Valuation of River Ecosystem Services by Rural Communities in the Colombian Orinoquia: A Volunteer Labor-for-Restoration Choice Experiment.

Integrated environmental assessment and management·2026
Same journal

Beyond Source Restrictions: Combined Mitigation Strategies Substantially Reduce Emissions and Exposure of Intentionally Added Microplastics in the UK.

Integrated environmental assessment and management·2026
Same journal

The role of Life Cycle Assessment in the Safe and Sustainable by Design: lessons learnt from a case study.

Integrated environmental assessment and management·2026
See all related articles
This summary is machine-generated.

Effective ecological risk assessments (ERAs) require clear goals, stakeholder collaboration, and uncertainty management. Integrating peer review early and enhancing predictive methods can advance ERA science and application.

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Risk Assessment
  • Ecology

Background:

  • The US Environmental Protection Agency Science Advisory Board's Ecological Processes and Effects Committee surveyed ecological risk assessment (ERA) practices.
  • The study aimed to advance the science and application of ERA in decision-making processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To characterize the current state of ecological risk assessment.
  • To identify factors that enhance the effectiveness of ERA in decision-making.
  • To propose recommendations for advancing ERA science and application.

Main Methods:

  • Convened a public workshop and conducted a self-initiated study.
  • Analyzed the effectiveness of ERA in decision-making contexts.
  • Reviewed current practices and identified areas for improvement.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • ERAs are most effective when management goals are clear, information needs are defined, and collaboration occurs among decision-makers, assessors, scientists, and stakeholders.
  • Ongoing dialogue during problem formulation and acknowledgment of uncertainties significantly improve assessment effectiveness.
  • Integration of risk assessment and monitoring programs, along with post-decision audits, is crucial.

Conclusions:

  • Peer review of ERAs should occur at the problem formulation stage.
  • Expanding predictive capabilities through methods like life cycle analysis can reduce uncertainties.
  • Future ERAs should incorporate multiple stressors, levels of biological organization, and spatial scales, with improved methods for interpreting evidence and cumulative risk assessment.