Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...

Test for Homogeneity

Test for Homogeneity

The goodness–of–fit test can be used to decide whether a population fits a given distribution, but it will not suffice to decide whether two populations follow the same unknown distribution. A different test, called the test for homogeneity, can be used to conclude whether two populations have the same distribution. To calculate the test statistic for a test for homogeneity, follow the same procedure as with the test of independence. The hypotheses for the test for homogeneity can be stated as...

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs

Sequencing of the human genome has opened up several best-kept secrets of the genome. Scientists have identified thousands of genome variations that exist within a population. These variations can be a single nucleotide or a larger chromosomal variation.
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Treatment of gaming disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Psychiatry research·2025

Same author

Loss of Elmsan1 in cardiomyocytes leads to age-dependent cardiac dysfunction and reduced lifespan.

American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology·2025

Same author

Addressing the Reproducibility Crisis in Science: It's About Time.

JACC. Basic to translational science·2024

Same author

Uncinate fasciculus microstructural organisation and emotion recognition in schizophrenia: controlling for hit rate bias.

Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience·2024

Same author

The COVID-19 lockdown experience suggests that restricting the supply of gambling can reduce gambling problems: An Australian prospective study.

Journal of behavioral addictions·2024

Same author

Metrological traceability in flow cytometry? Evaluation of a new volumetric method for lymphocyte subsets.

International journal of laboratory hematology·2023

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 6, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

SOGS and CGPI: parallel comparison on a diverse population.

Martin Young¹, Matthew Stevens

¹School for Social and Policy Research, Charles Darwin University, Ellengowan Drive, Casuarina, NT 0909, Australia. martin.young@cdu.edu.au

Journal of Gambling Studies

|March 11, 2008

Summary

This study compared two gambling screeners in Australia, finding they identified different problem gambler profiles based on demographics. The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) may overrepresent low-income individuals, while the Canadian Problem Gambling Index (CPGI) showed distinct gender differences.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 6, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Area of Science:

Public Health
Psychology
Sociology

Background:

The Northern Territory (NT) conducted its first population-based survey on gambling and problem gambling prevalence in 2005.
This jurisdiction is known for its demographic and social diversity.

Purpose of the Study:

To conduct a parallel comparison of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) and the Canadian Problem Gambling Index (CPGI).
To examine how these screens identify problem gamblers in relation to gender, region, and socio-demographic characteristics.

Main Methods:

Utilized data from the 2005 Northern Territory population-based gambling survey.
Administered both the SOGS and CPGI to the same sample of respondents.
Analyzed associations between screen-identified problem gamblers and socio-demographic variables.

Main Results:

The SOGS and CPGI identified significantly different groups of problem gamblers.
The SOGS may overrepresent problem gamblers in lower socioeconomic groups, including Indigenous populations, due to its focus on financial issues.
Gender-based differences were observed, with females linked to household variables and males to socioeconomic factors like income and education.

Conclusions:

Problem gambling screeners can yield different results, impacting population estimates and demographic associations.
Further research is needed to validate screeners for Indigenous populations and understand gender's role in problem gambling.
The findings highlight the importance of considering screener characteristics and demographic factors in problem gambling research.