Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects
Published on: September 18, 2012
Statistical analysis of "looked-but-failed-to-see" accidents: highlighting the involvement of two distinct mechanisms
Arnaud Koustanaï1, Emmanuelle Boloix, Pierre Van Elslande
1Department of Psychology, University of Provence I, 13621 Aix-en-Provence Cedex 1, France. koustanai@hotmail.com
Abstract:
Circumstances where "looked-but-failed-to-see" accidents arise are a particular subject of study. In order to better understand why normal drivers could miss a relevant event signaling danger, more than 500 accidents were analyzed in-depth with regard to driver-environment-goal interactions. Results show four typical situations that imply two distinct mechanisms. When a failure arose at the perceptual stage, drivers actually never saw the danger while they were going straight at a junction or turning left to park their car. When failure arose at the processing stage, there was evidence that drivers saw the danger even when their recall of it was lacking. In fact, drivers saw the danger too late to avoid collision when they were overtaking another road user or trying to find his/her way. These are called "looked-but-failed-to-see-accidents". Accident patterns are discussed according to driver's goal involvement and local setting to suggest directions for further investigation with a special emphasis on change blindness.
Related Concept Videos
Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence
H0: The two variables (factors)...
Statistical Significance
Introduction to Test of Independence
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
Determination of Expected Frequency
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
