Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

On the differences between two-dimensional and three-dimensional simulations for assessing elastographic image

Abhay V Patil1, Thomas A Krouskop, Jonathan Ophir

  • 1University of Texas Medical School, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, Ultrasonics Laboratory, Houston, TX, USA. avpatil@virginia.edu

Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
|March 18, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Elastography: Imaging the elastic properties of soft tissues with ultrasound.

Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001)·2016
Same author

Design and Testing of a Single-Element Ultrasound Viscoelastography System for Point-of-Care Edema Quantification.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2016
Same author

Ultrasound elastography assessment of bone/soft tissue interface.

Physics in medicine and biology·2015
Same author

An IVUS transducer for microbubble therapies.

IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control·2014
Same author

Small breast lesion classification performance using the normalized axial-shear strain area feature.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2013
Same author

Effect of permeability on the performance of elastographic imaging techniques.

IEEE transactions on medical imaging·2012
Same journal

Cardiac Natural Mechanical Wave Detection and Speed Estimation Using Deep Learning-Based 2-D Ultrasound Imaging: A Feasibility Study.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026
Same journal

Region-Specific Evaluation of Plaque Segmentation in Cross-sectional Projections of Carotid Ultrasound Images Using Deep Learning Models in a Sub-clinical Atherosclerosis Cohort.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026
Same journal

Simulating the Dedifferentiation Process of Thyroid Cancer: Insights from Mouse Models and Ultrasound Imaging.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026
Same journal

A Nomogram Based on Ultrasound Features for Predicting Major Intra-Operative Hemorrhage in Patients With Placenta Accreta Spectrum (PAS).

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026
Same journal

MedLP-HAFB-CLIP: Hierarchical Adaptive Large Model With Learnable Medical Prompts for Level II Ultrasound Standard Plane Identification.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026
Same journal

Data Assimilating B-splines for Model-based Regularization in Ultrasound Vector Flow Imaging.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026
See all related articles

Two-dimensional (2D) elastographic simulations overestimate image quality at higher strains compared to 3D models. Three-dimensional (3D) simulations are crucial for accurate elastographic image quality assessment, especially with varying tissue properties.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Ultrasound Technology

Background:

  • Elastography estimates tissue mechanical properties using ultrasound.
  • Accurate elastographic image quality assessment is vital for clinical applications.
  • Previous simulations often simplified tissue motion and ultrasound beam characteristics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a 3D elastographic simulation framework.
  • To estimate upper bounds on elastographic image quality.
  • To compare 2D and 3D simulation accuracy under various conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a 3D elastographic simulation framework.
  • Accounted for three-dimensional tissue motion and ultrasound beam.
  • Varied applied strains and beam width ratios.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzed signal-to-noise ratio (SNR(e)), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR(e)), and spatial resolution.

    • Main Results:

    • 2D simulations matched 3D results for strains < 0.7% but overestimated for strains > 0.7%.
    • Increasing elevational-to-lateral beamwidth ratio non-linearly degraded SNR(e).
    • Peak CNR(e) prediction differences between 2D and 3D reached 10 dB (contrast ratio 10) and 30 dB (contrast ratio 1.5).
    • Target detectability decreased with higher beam ratios, particularly at lower contrast ratios.

    Conclusions:

    • 3D simulations are essential for accurate upper bounds on elastographic image quality, especially at higher strains.
    • 2D simulations provide unreliable overestimations beyond a 0.7% strain threshold.
    • Ultrasound beam geometry significantly impacts elastographic performance.