Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Implicit and explicit learning: individual differences and IQ.

A S Reber1, F F Walkenfeld, R Hernstadt

  • 1Department of Psychology, Brooklyn College, City University of New York 11210.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|September 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sensing, feeling and sentience in unicellular organisms and living cells.

Bio Systems·2024
Same author

On psycho-linguistic paradigms.

Journal of psycholinguistic research·2013
Same author

The dual-task SRT procedure: fine-tuning the timing.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2001
Same author

The assessment of cognitive procedural learning in amnesia: why the tower of Hanoi has fallen down.

Brain and cognition·2001
Same author

Another wrinkle on the dual-task SRT experiment: it's probably not dual task.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2000
Same author

Implicit and explicit learning: differential effects of affective states.

Perceptual and motor skills·1994
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

The role of statistical learning in attentional guidance during search through naturalistic scenes.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Representing objects and features in long-term memory: A case for direct feature-feature binding.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Crossmodal correspondences influence adaptation during rule-based category learning of objects.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
See all related articles

Individual differences in cognitive tasks vary. Explicit learning tasks show large variations and correlate with intelligence quotient, unlike implicit learning tasks, which show minimal differences.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Evolutionary Psychology

Background:

  • Individual differences in cognitive performance are a key area of study.
  • Understanding the distinction between implicit and explicit learning is crucial for cognitive theories.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate individual differences in performance on implicit and explicit learning tasks.
  • To examine the relationship between task performance and intelligence quotient (IQ).
  • To contextualize findings within an evolutionary theory of cognitive processes.

Main Methods:

  • Subjects completed an artificial grammar-learning task (implicit) and a series-completion task (explicit).
  • Performance metrics were analyzed for individual variations.
  • Correlation analysis was performed between task performance and IQ scores.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Substantial individual differences were observed in the explicit task.
  • Relatively small individual differences were found in the implicit task.
  • Explicit task performance strongly correlated with IQ, while implicit task performance did not.

Conclusions:

  • Implicit and explicit learning processes exhibit distinct patterns of individual variability.
  • These differences align with an evolutionary model suggesting implicit systems are evolutionarily older than explicit ones.
  • The findings support the theory that implicit learning is less influenced by individual cognitive capacities like IQ.