Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Congruency effects in part-list cuing inhibition.

S A Sloman1, G H Bower, D Rohrer

  • 1Stanford University.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|September 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary

Part-list cuing inhibition occurs when retrieval cues conflict with encoding. Incongruent cues, unlike congruent ones, significantly enhance this memory inhibition effect.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

National Hospital for the Paralysed and Epileptic.

The Hospital·2018
Same author

Analyzing the dynamics of free recall: An integrative review of the empirical literature.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

Comprehension and memory for pictures.

Memory & cognition·2011
Same author

A propositional theory of recognition memory.

Memory & cognition·2011
Same author

Interference in memory for multiple contexts.

Memory & cognition·2011
Same author

Use of decompressive craniectomy after severe head trauma.

AORN journal·2002

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Memory Research

Background:

  • Part-list cuing inhibition demonstrates that providing cues from a studied list can impair recall of non-cued items.
  • Existing theories suggest retrieval inhibition is influenced by the relationship between cues and encoded information.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of retrieval incongruency in part-list cuing inhibition.
  • To determine if the mismatch between encoding and retrieval cue frameworks affects memory inhibition.

Main Methods:

  • Participants studied word lists and were then tested on free recall under different cueing conditions.
  • Cues were either congruent (matching study order) or incongruent (reordered into meaningful units like names or idioms) with the original list presentation.

Main Results:

  • Incongruent cues led to significantly greater part-list cuing inhibition compared to congruent cues across all experiments.
  • This finding supports the incongruency principle as a key factor in retrieval inhibition.

Conclusions:

  • The degree of part-list inhibition is modulated by the congruency between the retrieval cues and the original encoding context.
  • Memory retrieval processes are sensitive to the framework established during learning, with incongruent cues disrupting this framework and enhancing inhibition.

Related Experiment Videos