Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Probability Laws01:49

Probability Laws

Overview
Hardy-Weinberg Principle01:49

Hardy-Weinberg Principle

Diploid organisms have two alleles of each gene, one from each parent, in their somatic cells. Therefore, each individual contributes two alleles to the gene pool of the population. The gene pool of a population is the sum of every allele of all genes within that population and has some degree of variation. Genetic variation is typically expressed as a relative frequency, which is the percentage of the total population that has a given allele, genotype or phenotype.In the early 20th century,...
Pedigree Analysis01:35

Pedigree Analysis

Overview
Pedigree Analysis01:35

Pedigree Analysis

Overview
Trihybrid Crosses02:27

Trihybrid Crosses

Trihybrid Crosses
Some of Mendel’s crosses examined three pairs of contrasting characteristics. Such a cross is called a trihybrid cross. A trihybrid cross is a combination of three individual monohybrid crosses. For example, plant height (tall vs. short), seed shape (round vs. wrinkled), and seed color (yellow vs. green).
The F1 generation plants of a trihybrid cross are heterozygous for all three traits and produce eight gametes. Upon self-fertilization, these gametes have an equal chance to...
Genetic Drift03:33

Genetic Drift

Natural selection—probably the most well-known evolutionary mechanism—increases the prevalence of traits that enhance survival and reproduction. However, evolution does not merely propagate favorable traits, nor does it always benefit populations.Life is not fair. A deer grazing contentedly in a field can have her meal cut tragically short by a bolt of lightning. If the doomed doe is one of only three in the population, 1/3 of the population’s gene pool is lost. Random events like this can...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Different goals, common ground: A global perspective on dairy breeding objectives.

JDS communications·2026
Same author

Genome-wide association study of methane emissions, feed intake, residual feed intake, and body weight in Merino sheep.

Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience·2026
Same author

Approximating reliabilities of indirect predictions using single nucleotide polymorphism effects from large single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor evaluations.

Journal of dairy science·2025
Same author

Efficient implementation of multitrait random regression test-day models with external information for dairy cattle genomic evaluations.

Journal of dairy science·2025
Same author

Review: Genomic selection in the era of phenotyping based on digital images.

Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience·2025
Same author

All-breed single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor evaluations for fertility traits in US dairy cattle.

Journal of dairy science·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Induction and Evaluation of Inbreeding Crosses Using the Ant, Vollenhovia Emeryi
06:44

Induction and Evaluation of Inbreeding Crosses Using the Ant, Vollenhovia Emeryi

Published on: October 5, 2018

Technical note: recursive algorithm for inbreeding coefficients assuming nonzero inbreeding of unknown parents.

I Aguilar1, I Misztal

  • 1Animal and Dairy Science Department, University of Georgia, Athens 30602, USA.

Journal of Dairy Science
|March 20, 2008
PubMed
Summary

A new recursive algorithm accurately calculates inbreeding coefficients, even with unknown parents. This iterative method is faster than existing algorithms for large cattle populations.

More Related Videos

Digital PCR-based Competitive Index for High-throughput Analysis of Fitness in Salmonella
07:11

Digital PCR-based Competitive Index for High-throughput Analysis of Fitness in Salmonella

Published on: May 13, 2019

Frequency and Distribution of Crossovers in Caenorhabditis elegans Meiosis by SNP Genotyping using Real-time PCR
06:18

Frequency and Distribution of Crossovers in Caenorhabditis elegans Meiosis by SNP Genotyping using Real-time PCR

Published on: July 11, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Induction and Evaluation of Inbreeding Crosses Using the Ant, Vollenhovia Emeryi
06:44

Induction and Evaluation of Inbreeding Crosses Using the Ant, Vollenhovia Emeryi

Published on: October 5, 2018

Digital PCR-based Competitive Index for High-throughput Analysis of Fitness in Salmonella
07:11

Digital PCR-based Competitive Index for High-throughput Analysis of Fitness in Salmonella

Published on: May 13, 2019

Frequency and Distribution of Crossovers in Caenorhabditis elegans Meiosis by SNP Genotyping using Real-time PCR
06:18

Frequency and Distribution of Crossovers in Caenorhabditis elegans Meiosis by SNP Genotyping using Real-time PCR

Published on: July 11, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Animal Genetics
  • Quantitative Genetics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Inbreeding coefficients are crucial for genetic management in livestock.
  • Existing algorithms may be computationally intensive or less accurate with incomplete pedigrees.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To modify a recursive algorithm for calculating inbreeding coefficients.
  • To improve accuracy when dealing with non-zero inbreeding in unknown parents.
  • To enhance computational efficiency for large datasets.

Main Methods:

  • A recursive algorithm was adapted by replacing the inbreeding of animals with unknown parents with the mean inbreeding of their birth year.
  • The modified iterative algorithm was tested on a dataset of 17 million US Holsteins.
  • Convergence and computational time were compared against the VanRaden tabular method.

Main Results:

  • The modified recursive algorithm converged in 6 rounds.
  • Computational time per round was 4 minutes, twice as fast as the VanRaden algorithm.
  • The algorithm provided a good approximation of inbreeding, even with unordered pedigrees.

Conclusions:

  • The modified recursive algorithm offers a computationally efficient and accurate method for calculating inbreeding coefficients.
  • This approach is particularly beneficial for large populations with incomplete pedigree data.
  • The algorithm's simplicity and speed make it a valuable tool for geneticists and breeders.