Difficulties in diagnosing small round cell tumours of childhood from fine needle aspiration cytology samples

There are four basic reasons for the difficulties in diagnosing small round cell tumours (SRCT) in childhood from fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) samples. First, SRCTs are rare and it is difficult for cytopathologists to obtain enough experience for rendering reliable diagnoses. Second, SRCTs are morphologically very similar. Third, many SRCTs do not have specific antigens which could be demonstrated with immunocytochemistry (ICC) or they lose them when poorly differentiated. In addition, cross reactivity exists between some SRCTs. Unstandardized performance of ICC also contributes to the difficulties due to unreliable results. Fourth, suboptimal FNAC samples add additional pitfalls. The latter may be due to partly degenerate samples or to unrepresentative ones in cases where a SRCT is a heterologous component of another nosological entity. Lymphoma, neuroblastoma, nephroblastoma, Ewing's tumour/primitive neuroendocrine tumours and rhabdomyosarcoma are discussed in detail, while other less common SRCTs are mentioned as differential diagnoses when appropriate. The use of cytogenetic and molecular techniques for differentiating between certain SRCTs is helpful in some doubtful cases. However, there are still problems in the use of these techniques, especially their cost which may delay their being introduced in every cytopathology laboratory.