Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Working Memory01:24

Working Memory

Working memory refers to a combination of components, including short-term memory and attention, that allow an individual to hold information temporarily as we perform cognitive tasks. It is an essential cognitive function that enables the execution of complex tasks such as problem-solving, comprehension, and reasoning. Unlike short-term memory, which simply involves the storage of information for a brief period, working memory involves the active manipulation and processing of this information.
Higher Mental Functions of the Brain: Language01:10

Higher Mental Functions of the Brain: Language

Language is a system of communication that allows the expression of thoughts, ideas, and feelings. The brain processes language in both hemispheres.
Language formation and comprehension take place in the dominant hemisphere. The dominant hemisphere is responsible for understanding the meaning of spoken, written, or sign language, as well as the ability to communicate. For most people, the left hemisphere is the dominant one. The right hemisphere, then, gives tone and emotional context to the...
Lateralization01:28

Lateralization

Brain lateralization refers to the division of mental processes and functions between the two hemispheres of the brain, a phenomenon that optimizes neural efficiency and underpins complex abilities in humans. This specialization allows each hemisphere to perform tasks where it has a comparative advantage, facilitating more refined cognitive capabilities across different domains.
Encoding01:19

Encoding

Information enters the brain through encoding, which is the input of information into the memory system. Once sensory information is received from the environment, the brain labels or codes it. The information is then organized with similar information and connected to existing concepts. Encoding occurs through automatic processing and effortful processing.
Automatic processing involves the encoding of details like time, space, frequency, and the meaning of words, usually done without conscious...
Language and Cognition01:27

Language and Cognition

Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.
Information Processing Approach01:30

Information Processing Approach

The information-processing theory of cognitive development centers on fundamental mental processes, including attention, memory, and problem-solving skills. Researchers in this field examine how cognitive abilities, such as working memory, evolve and influence children's overall development. Studies indicate that children with stronger working memory tend to excel in reading comprehension, math, and problem-solving compared to peers with less efficient memory skills. Low working memory is also...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Beyond Accuracy: Cognitive Speed in Speech-in-Noise Processing and Its Implications for the Ease of Language Understanding Model.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2026
Same author

Working memory capacity moderates the effect of hearing aid experience on phonological processing performance.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2025
Same author

Improving Tracking of Selective Attention in Hearing Aid Users: The Role of Noise Reduction and Nonlinearity Compensation.

eNeuro·2025
Same author

Fluid Intelligence Partially Mediates the Effect of Working Memory on Speech Recognition in Noise.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2024
Same author

Facial mimicry interference reduces working memory accuracy for facial emotion expressions.

PloS one·2024
Same author

Combined effects of age and hearing impairment on utterances and requests for clarification in spontaneous conversation and a referential communication task.

International journal of language & communication disorders·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks
08:32

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks

Published on: September 5, 2019

Explicit processing demands reveal language modality-specific organization of working memory.

Mary Rudner1, Jerker Rönnberg

  • 1Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, The Swedish Institute for Disability Research, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. mary.rudner@liu.se

Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education
|March 21, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Working memory differences between Deaf Signers and Hearing Nonsigners appear under high cognitive load, impacting language processing. Sensory retention, not modality, may explain prior intermodal findings.

More Related Videos

A Semantic Priming Event-related Potential (ERP) Task to Study Lexico-semantic and Visuo-semantic Processing in Autism Spectrum Disorder
08:17

A Semantic Priming Event-related Potential (ERP) Task to Study Lexico-semantic and Visuo-semantic Processing in Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 12, 2018

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks
08:32

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks

Published on: September 5, 2019

A Semantic Priming Event-related Potential (ERP) Task to Study Lexico-semantic and Visuo-semantic Processing in Autism Spectrum Disorder
08:17

A Semantic Priming Event-related Potential (ERP) Task to Study Lexico-semantic and Visuo-semantic Processing in Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 12, 2018

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) model posits that modality-specific processing differences in working memory arise under explicit cognitive demands.
  • Previous research suggests intermodal differences in language processing, but the underlying mechanisms remain debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how working memory functions in Deaf Signers (DS), Hearing Signers (HS), and Hearing Nonsigners (HN) under varying cognitive loads.
  • To test the ELU model's prediction regarding explicit processing demands and modality differences.

Main Methods:

  • Three working memory experiments were conducted using easily nameable pictures as stimuli.
  • Participants included DS, HS, and HN groups.
  • Cognitive demands were manipulated to assess explicit processing requirements.

Main Results:

  • Overall performance was similar across DS, HS, and HN groups, indicating sensory retention differences may account for prior intermodal findings.
  • Under high explicit processing demands, significant differences emerged between DS and HN.
  • Working memory storage appears sensitive to temporal organization in both DS and HN, but retrieval is not for DS.

Conclusions:

  • Intermodal differences in language processing may stem from sensory retention rather than modality itself.
  • Working memory retrieval, specifically, shows modality-related differences in Deaf Signers under high cognitive load, aligning with the ELU model.
  • Semantic similarity generally impacts working memory performance across groups.