Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Pole and System Stability01:24

Pole and System Stability

The transfer function is a fundamental concept representing the ratio of two polynomials. The numerator and denominator encapsulate the system's dynamics. The zeros and poles of this transfer function are critical in determining the system's behavior and stability.
Simple poles are unique roots of the denominator polynomial. Each simple pole corresponds to a distinct solution to the system's characteristic equation, typically resulting in exponential decay terms in the system's response.
Stability01:28

Stability

The time response of a linear time-invariant (LTI) system can be divided into transient and steady-state responses. The transient response represents the system's initial reaction to a change in input and diminishes to zero over time. In contrast, the steady-state response is the behavior that persists after the transient effects have faded.
The stability of an LTI system is determined by the roots of its characteristic equation, known as poles. A system is stable if it produces a bounded...
Transient and Steady-state Response01:24

Transient and Steady-state Response

In control systems, test signals are essential for evaluating performance under various conditions. The ramp function is effective for systems undergoing gradual changes, while the step function is suitable for assessing systems facing sudden disturbances. For systems subjected to shock inputs, the impulse function is the most appropriate test signal.
These test signals are integral in designing control systems to exhibit two key performance aspects: transient response and steady-state response.
Time-Domain Interpretation of PD Control01:07

Time-Domain Interpretation of PD Control

Proportional-Derivative (PD) control is a widely used control method in various engineering systems to enhance stability and performance. In a system with only proportional control, common issues include high maximum overshoot and oscillation, observed in both the error signal and its rate of change. This behavior can be divided into three distinct phases: initial overshoot, subsequent undershoot, and gradual stabilization.
Consider the example of control of motor torque. Initially, a positive...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Virtual flying experience changes neural responses to seeing wings.

Cell reports·2026
Same author

Perceptual prediction error supports implicit process in motor learning.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same author

Use-dependent learning biases the initial state but not the learning dynamics of implicit adaptation.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same author

Testing sensorimotor timing across age and music experience in a real-world environment.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Force-velocity coupling limits human adaptation in physical human-robot interaction.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Dynamical stability and mechanical impedance are optimized when manipulating uncertain dynamically complex objects.

PLoS computational biology·2025
Same journal

Deep Learning Reveals Cross-Modal Neural Representations of Auditory and Visual Mental Imagery in MEG.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

Speech sensorimotor adaptation in young adult cochlear implant users with early implantation.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

How Visual Context Influences Lateral Stepping Regulation While Walking on Winding Paths.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

Simultaneous neuron evidence for much higher covariation with saccadic reaction time of superior colliculus than primary visual cortex visual responses.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

Separate Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Regions Participate in Distinct Large-Scale Networks Differentially Recruited for Social and Cognitive Control Functions.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

Comprehensive Analysis of Auditory Nerve Fiber Responses using Fiber-Specific Modeling.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Evaluating Postural Control and Lower-extremity Muscle Activation in Individuals with Chronic Ankle Instability
07:52

Evaluating Postural Control and Lower-extremity Muscle Activation in Individuals with Chronic Ankle Instability

Published on: September 18, 2020

Stability and variability: indicators for passive stability and active control in a rhythmic task.

Kunlin Wei1, Tjeerd M H Dijkstra, Dagmar Sternad

  • 1Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Journal of Neurophysiology
|March 21, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Human ball bouncing reveals how skill affects control. Experienced players leverage inherent stability, reduce noise, and actively compensate for errors, adapting strategies based on task difficulty.

More Related Videos

Experimental Methods to Study Human Postural Control
08:12

Experimental Methods to Study Human Postural Control

Published on: September 11, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Evaluating Postural Control and Lower-extremity Muscle Activation in Individuals with Chronic Ankle Instability
07:52

Evaluating Postural Control and Lower-extremity Muscle Activation in Individuals with Chronic Ankle Instability

Published on: September 18, 2020

Experimental Methods to Study Human Postural Control
08:12

Experimental Methods to Study Human Postural Control

Published on: September 11, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Motor control
  • Human-robot interaction
  • Biomechanics

Background:

  • Rhythmic motor tasks like ball bouncing involve complex interplay of stability and variability.
  • Understanding the contributions of open-loop control, noise, and active compensation is crucial for motor learning.
  • Previous research often treats stability and variability as inversely related, potentially overlooking nuanced dynamics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To disentangle the contributions of open-loop control, noise strength, and active error compensation in a rhythmic ball-bouncing task.
  • To investigate how experienced and novice performers differ in their use of these control strategies.
  • To examine how participants adapt their control strategies in response to varying task stability.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a stochastic-deterministic model of ball bouncing to analyze stability and variability.
  • Employed stability analysis, assessing racket acceleration at ball contact.
  • Utilized autocovariance and regression analyses to quantify open-loop stability, noise, and active error compensation.

Main Results:

  • Experienced performers demonstrated greater exploitation of open-loop stability, reduced noise, and enhanced active error compensation compared to novices.
  • Task stability was manipulated via the coefficient of restitution, revealing adaptive strategy grading by participants.
  • Actors tuned their control strategies, prioritizing inherent stability in high-stability conditions and increasing active compensation when stability decreased.

Conclusions:

  • Motor control strategies are actively tuned by performers based on task stability, challenging the simple inverse relationship between stability and variability.
  • Findings suggest distinct neural underpinnings for passive stability and active control mechanisms.
  • Combined model and empirical analyses provide a more quantitative understanding of motor control in rhythmic tasks.