Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evolutionary inference from QST.

Michael C Whitlock1

  • 1Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4. whitlock@zoology.ubc.ca

Molecular Ecology
|March 28, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

FST and genetic diversity in an island model with background selection.

PLoS genetics·2024
Same author

The genetic architecture of repeated local adaptation to climate in distantly related plants.

Nature ecology & evolution·2024
Same author

How useful are genomic data for predicting maladaptation to future climate?

Global change biology·2024
Same author

The evolution of genetic covariance and modularity as a result of multigenerational environmental fluctuation.

Evolution letters·2023
Same author

The WZA: A window-based method for characterizing genotype-environment associations.

Molecular ecology resources·2023
Same author

Using genome scans to identify genes used repeatedly for adaptation.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2023
Same journal

Differential Immune Responses Correlate With Chytridiomycosis Severity in Italian Crested Newts.

Molecular ecology·2026
Same journal

Demography and Environment Shapes Genetic Variation: Spatiotemporal Genetic Dynamics in Cyclic Voles at Low Latitudes.

Molecular ecology·2026
Same journal

Gut Microbiome-Metabolome Reconfiguration Associates With Phenotypic Plasticity of Daphnia Under Predation Risk.

Molecular ecology·2026
Same journal

Population Genomics Highlight the Vulnerability of Coral-Dwelling Gobies to Ecological Losses due to Climatic Disturbances.

Molecular ecology·2026
Same journal

Ancient Divergences of the Maritime Alpine Tree Larix lyallii (Pinaceae) Contrasts With Patterns in Other Pacific Northwest Coastal Disjuncts.

Molecular ecology·2026
Same journal

Ontogenetic Sequence of Differential Gene Expression in Predator-Induced Daphnia pulex.

Molecular ecology·2026
See all related articles

Comparing genetic differentiation metrics Q(ST) and F(ST) is statistically complex. This study reviews their uses, assumptions, and statistics, proposing a new method for robust comparisons of quantitative trait and neutral genetic variation.

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary biology
  • Population genetics
  • Quantitative genetics

Background:

  • Q(ST) measures genetic differentiation in quantitative traits, often compared to F(ST) from neutral loci.
  • Q(ST)=F(ST) traditionally suggests diversifying selection, but statistical challenges exist.
  • Accurate comparison requires assessing Q(ST) against the F(ST) distribution, not just the mean.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the statistical methodologies, assumptions, and applications of Q(ST) and F(ST) comparisons.
  • To identify biases and sampling errors in Q(ST) calculations.
  • To propose and evaluate a novel statistical approach for comparing Q(ST) and F(ST).

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on Q(ST) and F(ST) statistics.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of statistical challenges in comparing Q(ST) to F(ST) distributions.
  • Development and simulation-based testing of a new method for Q(ST)/F(ST) comparison.

    • Main Results:

    • Q(ST)/F(ST) comparisons are statistically demanding, requiring comparison to the F(ST) distribution.
    • Biases and sampling errors affecting Q(ST) were reviewed.
    • Simulations indicate Q(ST) and F(ST) distributions are robust to island model deviations, approximating the Lewontin-Krakauer prediction.

    Conclusions:

    • The comparison of genetic differentiation metrics Q(ST) and F(ST) requires careful statistical treatment beyond simple mean comparisons.
    • A new method is suggested to address the statistical challenges in Q(ST)/F(ST) analysis.
    • The distributions of Q(ST) and F(ST) remain reliable approximations even with deviations from idealized population models.