Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Estimating the encounter rate variance in distance sampling.

Rachel M Fewster1, Stephen T Buckland, Kenneth P Burnham

  • 1Department of Statistics, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand. r.fewster@auckland.ac.nz

Biometrics
|March 28, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Shifting responses of goose-beaked whales (Ziphius cavirostris) to long-standing naval sonar exposure opens new perspectives for research and mitigation.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Microbial and small zooplankton communities predict density of baleen whales in the southern California Current Ecosystem.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Methods for analysing wildlife DNA methylation data.

Conservation physiology·2026
Same author

An experimental approach to assess the combined effects of multiple stressors on a large vertebrate species.

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology·2026
Same author

Estimating the detection probability of long-ranging baleen whale song using a single sensor: Towards density estimation.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2025
Same author

The combined effects of multiple stressors in an endangered, long-lived species: Lessons learned and ways forward.

Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America·2025
Same journal

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

A Bayesian phase I/II platform design with data augmentation accounting for delayed outcomes.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

Encounter rate variance in line transect sampling is a major challenge. This study shows that design-based estimators improve accuracy for random surveys, while post-stratification reduces bias in systematic surveys with spatial trends.

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Wildlife Biology
  • Statistical Ecology

Background:

  • Encounter rate variance is a primary source of error in line transect sampling.
  • Systematic survey designs aim to minimize variability but complicate variance estimation.
  • Existing estimators often approximate variance by assuming simple random sampling.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate encounter rate variance estimators under random and systematic survey designs.
  • To compare design-based and model-based variance estimation methods.
  • To assess the impact of spatial trends on variance estimation accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Exploration of variance estimator properties under different designs (random vs. systematic).
  • Comparison of a design-based estimator with the model-based estimator from Buckland et al. (2001).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Investigation of post-stratification as a bias reduction technique.

    • Main Results:

    • The design-based variance estimator outperforms the model-based estimator for random transect designs.
    • Both estimators exhibit significant positive bias under systematic designs when populations have strong spatial trends.
    • Post-stratification effectively mitigates this bias in systematic designs.

    Conclusions:

    • Design-based variance estimation is superior for random line transect surveys.
    • Systematic designs with spatial trends require careful consideration of variance estimation.
    • Post-stratification offers a robust solution to reduce bias in systematic survey variance estimation.