Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Dialect variation in Mediterranean sperm whales shows evidence of cultural evolution in an isolated population.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026

Same author

Machine learning discriminates bacterial, fungal, and viral infections using temporal blood analyte dynamics in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus).

American journal of veterinary research·2026

Same author

Acoustic individual identification in a species of field cricket using deep learning.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026

Same author

Vocal compensation to noise in long-finned pilot whales (Globicephala melas).

The Journal of experimental biology·2026

Same author

An experimental approach to assess the combined effects of multiple stressors on a large vertebrate species.

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology·2026

Same author

Proteomic Characterization of Bottlenose Dolphin (<i>Tursiops truncatus</i>) Urine.

Journal of proteome research·2025

Same journal

Same species, different risks: predation shapes hormonal profiles in a breeding sea duck, the common eider.

Conservation physiology·2026

Same journal

Two years at the editor's desk: reflections on community, diversity and impact.

Conservation physiology·2026

Same journal

Thermal and immunological stress modulate the locomotor performance of female <i>Xenopus laevis</i> frogs.

Conservation physiology·2026

Same journal

The ideal candidate for the job: how epaulette sharks (<i>Hemiscyllium ocellatum</i>) have emerged as a model for climate-ready shark conservation.

Conservation physiology·2026

Same journal

A new hormonal marker for tracking rhino pregnancy.

Conservation physiology·2026

Same journal

Fatty acid profiles recorded in ocean prey and California salmonine eggs reveal maternal ocean diets linked to thiamine deficiency.

Conservation physiology·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 5, 2026

DNA Methylation: Bisulphite Modification and Analysis

DNA Methylation: Bisulphite Modification and Analysis

Published on: October 21, 2011

Methods for analysing wildlife DNA methylation data.

Theoni Photopoulou^1,2, Ian Durbach^1,2, Enrico Pirotta¹

¹Centre for Research into Ecological and Environmental Modelling, University of St Andrews, The Observatory, Buchanan Gardens, St Andrews, Scotland KY16 9LZ, UK.

Conservation Physiology

|February 27, 2026

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

DNA methylation analysis offers insights into wildlife health and age. However, current epigenetic clock models struggle to accurately assess both age and health simultaneously in wild populations.

Keywords:

DNA methylation chronological age epigenetic age health methylation array wildlife

More Related Videos

Methodology for Accurate Detection of Mitochondrial DNA Methylation

Methodology for Accurate Detection of Mitochondrial DNA Methylation

Published on: May 20, 2018

Sample Preparation to Bioinformatics Analysis of DNA Methylation: Association Strategy for Obesity and Related Trait Studies

Sample Preparation to Bioinformatics Analysis of DNA Methylation: Association Strategy for Obesity and Related Trait Studies

Published on: May 6, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 5, 2026

DNA Methylation: Bisulphite Modification and Analysis

DNA Methylation: Bisulphite Modification and Analysis

Published on: October 21, 2011

Methodology for Accurate Detection of Mitochondrial DNA Methylation

Methodology for Accurate Detection of Mitochondrial DNA Methylation

Published on: May 20, 2018

Sample Preparation to Bioinformatics Analysis of DNA Methylation: Association Strategy for Obesity and Related Trait Studies

Sample Preparation to Bioinformatics Analysis of DNA Methylation: Association Strategy for Obesity and Related Trait Studies

Published on: May 6, 2022

Area of Science:

Wildlife conservation epigenetics
Population health assessment
Genomic data analysis

Background:

DNA methylation analysis is increasingly used in wildlife conservation for insights into age, traits, and health.
Existing statistical methods are primarily developed for human biomedical research, necessitating adaptation for wildlife studies.

Purpose of the Study:

To review key DNA methylation methodologies for wildlife research, including those from human studies.
To illustrate these methods with a case study on bottlenose dolphins.
To evaluate the accuracy of epigenetic clocks for age and health assessment in wildlife.

Main Methods:

Review of statistical methodologies for DNA methylation data analysis.
Application of methods to a dataset of wild bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops spp.).
Comparison of epigenetic clock models for estimating chronological age and health indicators.

Main Results:

Epigenetic clocks can estimate chronological age but struggle to accurately assess health indicators simultaneously.
A single epigenetic model cannot reliably predict both age and health due to confounding factors.
The limitations of clock-type models may explain inconsistencies in age-related health findings.

Conclusions:

Decoupling age and health analyses is crucial for accurate wildlife epigenomic studies.
Further development of statistical methods is needed to address the dual goals of age prediction and health assessment in wildlife.
Understanding these limitations is vital for advancing wildlife conservation through epigenetics.