Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

X-ray Imaging01:24

X-ray Imaging

German physicist Wilhelm Röntgen (1845–1923) was experimenting with electrical current when he discovered that a mysterious and invisible "ray" would pass through his flesh but leave an outline of his bones on a screen coated with a metal compound. In 1895, Röntgen made the first durable record of the internal parts of a living human: an "X-ray" image (as it came to be called) of his wife’s hand. Scientists worldwide quickly began their own experiments with X-rays, and by 1900, X-ray was widely...
Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Instrumentation01:22

Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Instrumentation

The instrumentation of atomic emission spectrometry (AES) involves various components, including atomization devices that convert samples into gas-phase atoms and ions. There are two main types of atomization devices: continuous and discrete atomizers.  Continuous atomizers, like plasmas and flames, introduce samples in a constant stream, while discrete atomizers inject individual samples using syringes or autosamplers. The most common discrete atomizer is the electrothermal atomizer.
Imaging Biological Samples with Optical Microscopy01:18

Imaging Biological Samples with Optical Microscopy

Optical microscopy uses optic principles to provide detailed images of samples. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek designed the first compound optical microscope in the 17th century to visualize blood cells, bacteria, and yeast cells. In 1830, Joseph Jackson Lister created an essentially modern light microscope. The 20th century saw the development of microscopes with enhanced magnification and resolution.
In optical microscopy, the specimen to be viewed is placed on a glass slide and clipped on the stage...
Confocal Fluorescence Microscopy01:16

Confocal Fluorescence Microscopy

Confocal microscopy is an advanced microscopic technique. The prime advantage of the confocal microscope over other microscopy techniques is its ability to block the out-of-focus light from the illuminated samples using pinholes. It is widely used with fluorescence optics to obtain high-resolution, sharp contrast images. Unlike optical microscopes, confocal microscopes use a focused beam of light laser to scan the entire sample surface at different z-planes. These microscopes are, therefore,...
Light Acquisition02:16

Light Acquisition

In order to produce glucose, plants need to capture sufficient light energy. Many modern plants have evolved leaves specialized for light acquisition. Leaves can be only millimeters in width or tens of meters wide, depending on the environment. Due to competition for sunlight, evolution has driven the evolution of increasingly larger leaves and taller plants, to avoid shading by their neighbors with contaminant elaboration of root architecture and mechanisms to transport water and nutrients.
Super-resolution Fluorescence Microscopy01:37

Super-resolution Fluorescence Microscopy

Super-resolution fluorescence microscopy (SRFM) provides a better resolution than conventional fluorescence microscopy by reducing the point spread function (PSF). PSF is the light intensity distribution from a point that causes it to appear blurred. Due to PSF, each fluorescing point appears bigger than its actual size, and it is the PSF interference of nearby fluorophores that causes the blurred image. Various approaches to achieving higher resolution through SRFM have recently been developed.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Association mechanism between Arabidopsis immune coreceptor BAK1 and Pseudomonas syringae effector HopF2.

Biochemical and biophysical research communications·2024
Same author

Inhibition of ZDHHC16 promoted osteogenic differentiation and reduced ferroptosis of dental pulp stem cells by CREB.

BMC oral health·2024
Same author

OH2 oncolytic virus: A novel approach to glioblastoma intervention through direct targeting of tumor cells and augmentation of anti-tumor immune responses.

Cancer letters·2024
Same author

[Effects of helium-oxygen mechanical ventilation on inflammatory response of diseased lung segments and diaphragm function in patients with pneumonia].

Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue·2024
Same author

Advances in Ferroptosis-Inducing Agents by Targeted Delivery System in Cancer Therapy.

International journal of nanomedicine·2024
Same author

Coccidioides Serologic Screening Practices in Individuals With Rheumatic and Autoimmune Diseases.

ACR open rheumatology·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Assembly, Tuning and Use of an Apertureless Near Field Infrared Microscope for Protein Imaging
12:27

Assembly, Tuning and Use of an Apertureless Near Field Infrared Microscope for Protein Imaging

Published on: November 25, 2009

Aperture optimization in emission imaging using ideal observers for joint detection and localization.

Lili Zhou1, Parmeshwar Khurd, Santosh Kulkarni

  • 1Department of Radiology, Stony Brook University, NY 11790, USA.

Physics in Medicine and Biology
|March 28, 2008
PubMed
Summary

Optimizing pinhole diameter for medical imaging requires balancing detection and localization. Decreased localization tolerance shrinks the optimal pinhole size, impacting imaging system performance.

More Related Videos

Simultaneous Multicolor Imaging of Biological Structures with Fluorescence Photoactivation Localization Microscopy
12:51

Simultaneous Multicolor Imaging of Biological Structures with Fluorescence Photoactivation Localization Microscopy

Published on: December 9, 2013

Automated Two-dimensional Spatiotemporal Analysis of Mobile Single-molecule FRET Probes
08:26

Automated Two-dimensional Spatiotemporal Analysis of Mobile Single-molecule FRET Probes

Published on: November 23, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Assembly, Tuning and Use of an Apertureless Near Field Infrared Microscope for Protein Imaging
12:27

Assembly, Tuning and Use of an Apertureless Near Field Infrared Microscope for Protein Imaging

Published on: November 25, 2009

Simultaneous Multicolor Imaging of Biological Structures with Fluorescence Photoactivation Localization Microscopy
12:51

Simultaneous Multicolor Imaging of Biological Structures with Fluorescence Photoactivation Localization Microscopy

Published on: December 9, 2013

Automated Two-dimensional Spatiotemporal Analysis of Mobile Single-molecule FRET Probes
08:26

Automated Two-dimensional Spatiotemporal Analysis of Mobile Single-molecule FRET Probes

Published on: November 23, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Medical imaging
  • Image analysis
  • Observer performance studies

Background:

  • Ideal observers optimize imaging parameters for signal detection in planar emission imaging.
  • Traditional methods focus on signal presence/absence, not joint detection and localization.
  • Realistic imaging tasks require both signal detection and localization within variable backgrounds.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how incorporating a signal localization requirement affects optimal aperture (pinhole diameter) design in planar emission imaging.
  • To compare aperture optimization for detection-only tasks versus joint detection/localization tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Formulated an ideal observer model for the joint detection/localization task.
  • Applied the ideal observer to determine the optimal pinhole diameter in a planar emission imaging system.
  • Analyzed the impact of localization tolerance and background variability on optimal aperture size and task performance.

Main Results:

  • Reduced localization tolerance leads to a smaller optimal pinhole diameter compared to detection-only tasks.
  • Task performance becomes more sensitive to pinhole diameter variations when localization is required.
  • Increased background variability shrinks the optimal pinhole diameter for both detection and joint tasks.
  • Unlike detection-only tasks, the joint task yields a finite optimal aperture size even without background variability.

Conclusions:

  • The requirement to localize a signal significantly alters aperture optimization strategies in emission imaging.
  • Optimal pinhole diameter is dependent on the trade-off between detection sensitivity and localization accuracy.
  • Background variability plays a crucial role in determining aperture size for both detection and localization tasks.