[Diastolic dysfunction types in the prediction of viable myocardium functional recovery]
Radomir Matunović1, Zdravko Mijailović, Dragan Tavciovski
1Vojnomedicinska akademija, Klinika za kardiologiju, Crnotravska 17, 11 040 Beograd, Srbija. matun@eunet.zyu
Insights
Restrictive left ventricular diastolic filling type indicates a poor prognosis for patients undergoing surgical revascularization for heart failure. This finding is crucial for predicting outcomes in coronary artery disease patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
- Echocardiography
Background:
- Patients with coronary artery disease and viable myocardium may benefit from surgical revascularization, even with reduced ejection fraction (EF) and systolic dysfunction.
- Understanding the relationship between left ventricular (LV) diastolic filling patterns and early recovery is crucial for optimizing surgical outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between different LV diastolic filling types and contractile recovery (CR) after surgical revascularization.
- To analyze the impact of diastolic dysfunction on early postoperative recovery and complications in patients with varying systolic function.
Main Methods:
- Sixty patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) were analyzed.
- Diastolic dysfunction was assessed using Doppler echocardiography, categorizing patients into three groups: impaired relaxation, pseudonormal, and restrictive filling.
- Systolic function was subgrouped into relatively recovered (EF > 40%) and pronounced LV dysfunction (EF < 40%).
Main Results:
- The restrictive filling group showed the lowest improvement in systolic function (53.8%) and the highest rates of mortality (23.1%) and cardiovascular complications (38.5%) post-CABG.
- Patients with pseudonormal filling demonstrated better systolic function recovery (78.9%) compared to the restrictive group.
- Mean WMISI LV values tended to decrease across all groups post-CABG, but the restrictive group had the least improvement.
Conclusions:
- Restrictive LV diastolic filling type serves as a significant marker for poor prognosis in patients with heart failure undergoing surgical revascularization.
- Patients with heart failure and preserved systolic function exhibited a similar prognosis to those with restrictive filling patterns.
Background/Aim:
It is well known that patients with coronary artery disease and viable tissue as a guarantee of contractile recovery (CR), despite of decreasing ejection fraction (EF) and systolic dysfunction, could have benefit from surgical revascularization. Therefore, relationship between diastolic filling type and early postoperative recovery and complications need to be established. The aim of this study was to investigate the relation between different left ventricular (LV) diastolic filling types and CR in patients after surgical revascularization with differently preserved systolic function.
Methods:
We investigated 60 patients. All of them had CR estimated by stress echocardiography regardless the extent of recovery of the heart systolic function. Echocardiographic evidence of diastolic dysfunction was estimated by Doppler examination of transmitral diastolic flow. According to the derived different diastolic filling types the patients were divided into three groups: I--patients with disorder of LV relaxation, II--with pseudovascularisation, and III--with restrictive filling type, and according to the value of systolic function into two subgroups: (1) relatively recovered systolic function--EF > 40% and (2) pronounced LV dysfunction--EF < 40%. Echocardiographic evaluation was performed before and two week after surgical revascularization. In the preoperative period the medication therapy was optimized. We estimated CR by echocardiografic pare meters but also by detection of cardiovascular events.
Results:
After CABG the mean value of WMISI LV tended to decrease in any groups: in the group I (n = 12) from 1.64 +/- 0.22 to 1.34 +/- 0.22; in the group II (n = 22) from 1.85 +/- 0.16 to 1.53 +/- 0.42, and in the group III (n=26) from 1.92 +/- 0.29 to 1.81 +/- 0.52. The lowest improvement of systolic function according to EF value expressed by the number of patients was found in the group of patients with restrictive LV filling type (12; 53.8%) as contrasting to the group with pseudonormalisation (15; 78.9%). In the group of patients with restrictive diastolic filling type also was recorded the highest number of lethal outcomes (6; 23.1%), as well as cardiovascular complications (10; 38.5%).
Conclusions:
Restrictive LV diastolic filling type was the marker of poor prognosis in the patients with clinical heart failure undergoing surgical revascularization. The patients with heart failure and preserved systolic function were associated with similar prognosis.
More Related Videos
08:57Pulsed Wave Doppler Assessment of Diastolic Dysfunction in the ZSF-1 Rat Model of Pulmonary Hypertension Due to Left Heart Disease
Published on: May 22, 2026
12:12Echocardiographic Approaches and Protocols for Comprehensive Phenotypic Characterization of Valvular Heart Disease in Mice
Published on: February 14, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
