Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Bone Remodeling

Bone Remodeling

Bone remodeling is a continuous and balanced process of bone resorption by osteoclasts and bone formation by osteoblasts. In adults, it helps maintain bone mass and calcium homeostasis. While mechanical stress can stimulate turnover as part of the normal maintenance and reparative process, several hormones also regulate bone remodeling.

Bone Cells and Tissue

Bone Cells and Tissue

Bones contain a relatively small number of cells entrenched in a matrix of organic and inorganic components. Although bone cells compose only a small amount of the bone volume, they are crucial to its function. Four types of cells are found within the bone tissue— osteoblasts, osteocytes, osteogenic cells, and osteoclasts.
Osteoblasts and Osteocytes
The osteoblast is the bone cell responsible for forming new bone tissue. It is found in the growing portions of bone, including the periosteum and...

Osteoclasts in Bone Remodeling

Osteoclasts in Bone Remodeling

Osteoclasts are cells responsible for bone resorption and remodeling. They originate from hematopoietic progenitor cells present in the bone marrow. Numerous progenitor cells fuse to form multinucleated cells, each with 10-20 nuclei. A single osteoclast has a diameter of 150 to 200 µM. These cells have ruffled borders that break down the underlying bone tissue and release minerals such as calcium into the blood in bone resorption. Osteoclasts cling to bones with their ruffled edges during bone...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Immersive Haptic Simulation for Psychomotor Skill Acquisition in Preclinical Prosthetic Dentistry: A Randomized Study.

The International journal of prosthodontics·2026

Same author

Bone Augmentation of Atrophic Alveolar Ridges Using a Synthetic Bone Substitute With Mesenchymal Stem Cells: A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial.

Clinical oral implants research·2025

Same author

Low and High Molecular Mass Anthraquinone Derivatives Containing Substituents of Varying Electron Donating Properties: Electrochemical and Spectroelectrochemical Properties.

The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces·2025

Same author

Benefits of using immersive virtual reality in haptic dental simulation for endodontic access cavity training: A comparative crossover study.

International endodontic journal·2025

Same author

Predicting novice dental students' performances in conventional simulation: A prospective pilot study using haptic exercises.

Journal of dental sciences·2025

Same author

Graphite-Based Localized Heating Technique for Growing Large Area Methylammonium Lead Bromide Single Crystalline Perovskite Wafers and Their Charge Transfer Characteristics.

ACS omega·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Distinctive Capillary Action by Micro-channels in Bone-like Templates can Enhance Recruitment of Cells for Restoration of Large Bony Defect

Distinctive Capillary Action by Micro-channels in Bone-like Templates can Enhance Recruitment of Cells for Restoration of Large Bony Defect

Published on: September 11, 2015

Osteoblastic cell behavior on nanostructured metal implants.

Laurent Le Guehennec¹, Frantz Martin, Marco-Antonio Lopez-Heredia

¹INSERM U791, Laboratory for Osteo-Articular & Dental Tissue Engineering, Faculty of dDental Surgery, 44042 Nantes, France.

Nanomedicine (London, England)

|April 9, 2008

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Nanostructured stainless steel (Nano-SS) surfaces enhance osteoblastic cell adhesion and differentiation compared to smooth surfaces. This suggests nanostructured surfaces may improve the osseointegration of metal implants.

More Related Videos

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage

Published on: February 10, 2014

Multi-Scale Modification of Metallic Implants With Pore Gradients, Polyelectrolytes and Their Indirect Monitoring In vivo

Multi-Scale Modification of Metallic Implants With Pore Gradients, Polyelectrolytes and Their Indirect Monitoring In vivo

Published on: July 1, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Distinctive Capillary Action by Micro-channels in Bone-like Templates can Enhance Recruitment of Cells for Restoration of Large Bony Defect

Distinctive Capillary Action by Micro-channels in Bone-like Templates can Enhance Recruitment of Cells for Restoration of Large Bony Defect

Published on: September 11, 2015

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage

Published on: February 10, 2014

Multi-Scale Modification of Metallic Implants With Pore Gradients, Polyelectrolytes and Their Indirect Monitoring In vivo

Multi-Scale Modification of Metallic Implants With Pore Gradients, Polyelectrolytes and Their Indirect Monitoring In vivo

Published on: July 1, 2013

Area of Science:

Biomaterials Science
Materials Engineering
Cell Biology

Background:

Surface modifications at the nanometric scale can influence protein adsorption and cell adhesion.
Improved osseointegration of metal implants is crucial for their long-term success.
Osteoblastic cells play a key role in bone formation and implant integration.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the behavior of osteoblastic cells on nanostructured stainless steel (Nano-SS) surfaces compared to smooth stainless steel (Smooth-SS).
To evaluate the potential of nanostructured surfaces for enhancing implant osseointegration.

Main Methods:

Nanostructuration of stainless steel surfaces was achieved through anodization.
Surface characterization was performed using scanning electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy (AFM), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy.
Osteoblastic cells were cultured on both Smooth-SS and Nano-SS surfaces for behavior analysis.

Main Results:

AFM revealed a regular array of pores on the Nano-SS surfaces.
Osteoblastic cells exhibited more rapid spreading on Nano-SS compared to Smooth-SS.
Cell viability was comparable on both surface types, but alkaline phosphatase activity was significantly enhanced on Nano-SS at 21 days.

Conclusions:

Nanostructuration of stainless steel surfaces promotes osteoblastic cell adhesion and spreading.
The enhanced alkaline phosphatase activity suggests improved osteoblastic differentiation on nanostructured surfaces.
Surface nanostructuration holds promise for improving the osseointegration of metal implants.