Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Errors in Taping

Errors in Taping

Errors in taping arise from multiple factors that can significantly impact measurement accuracy in surveying. Misalignment of the tape, often due to human error, is one primary source. A skilled rear tapeman, using a telescope, can help correct alignment by guiding the head tapeman; however, human limitations still lead to small inaccuracies. These errors may include misplacement of pins or inaccurate tape readings due to common visual confusions, such as mistaking a six for a nine. Such...

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...

Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting

Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting

The guidelines and strategies provided by the American Nurses Association (ANA) and the Canadian Nurses Association (CNA) offer essential principles for ensuring safe and secure computer charting systems in healthcare settings. Let's break down each recommendation:
Maintain Confidentiality and Security:

Purpose of Health Records I

Purpose of Health Records I

The vital purpose of health records is to provide a complete and accurate account of a patient's medical history, including communication, diagnostic and therapeutic orders, care planning, research, and quality review.
Here's a breakdown of how health records serve these purposes:

Purpose of Health Records II

Purpose of Health Records II

Health records serve various essential purposes in the healthcare system. Here are some key purposes:

Data Reporting and Recording

Data Reporting and Recording

Reporting and recording are crucial in data documentation. The timely, thorough, and accurate documentation of facts is essential when recording patient data. Failure to record findings during an assessment or interpretation of a problem will result in loss of information and make the patient document unreliable. The reader is left with general impressions if the information is not specific. A recording is documenting data of the individual's health information in a traceable, secure, and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Virtual care in residential aged care and primary care settings: a systematic literature review using the SEIPS framework.

International journal of medical informatics·2025

Same author

Before the East African Radiation: Sex Chromosome Systems in Basal Haplotilapiine Cichlids.

Genome biology and evolution·2025

Same author

Evaluating primary care expenditure in Australia: the Primary Care Spend (PC Spend) model.

The Medical journal of Australia·2025

Same author

Hospital Testing of the Effectiveness of Co-Designed Educational Materials to Improve Patient and Visitor Knowledge and Confidence in Reporting Patient Deterioration.

Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety·2023

Same author

PANORAMIC: important insights into molnupiravir use in COVID-19.

Lancet (London, England)·2022

Same author

Interventions to address potentially inappropriate prescriptions and over-the-counter medication use among adults 65 years and older in primary care settings: protocol for a systematic review.

Systematic reviews·2022

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Databases to Efficiently Manage Medium Sized, Low Velocity, Multidimensional Data in Tissue Engineering

Databases to Efficiently Manage Medium Sized, Low Velocity, Multidimensional Data in Tissue Engineering

Published on: November 22, 2019

Lessons from the TAPS study - errors relating to medical records.

Meredith A B Makeham¹, Charles Bridges-Webb, Michael R Kidd

¹Discipline of General Practice, The University of Sydney, New South Wales. meredith@gp.med.usyd.edu.au

Australian Family Physician

|April 10, 2008

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

The Threats to Australian Patient Safety (TAPS) Study gathered 648 reports on patient safety threats from Australian GPs. Analysis of these events provides crucial clinical lessons for improving healthcare safety.

More Related Videos

TBase - an Integrated Electronic Health Record and Research Database for Kidney Transplant Recipients

TBase - an Integrated Electronic Health Record and Research Database for Kidney Transplant Recipients

Published on: April 13, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Databases to Efficiently Manage Medium Sized, Low Velocity, Multidimensional Data in Tissue Engineering

Databases to Efficiently Manage Medium Sized, Low Velocity, Multidimensional Data in Tissue Engineering

Published on: November 22, 2019

TBase - an Integrated Electronic Health Record and Research Database for Kidney Transplant Recipients

TBase - an Integrated Electronic Health Record and Research Database for Kidney Transplant Recipients

Published on: April 13, 2021

Area of Science:

Medical Safety
General Practice
Healthcare Quality Improvement

Background:

The Threats to Australian Patient Safety (TAPS) Study aimed to identify and analyze threats to patient safety in Australian general practice.
The study collected anonymous reports from a representative sample of general practitioners (GPs) to capture a broad range of safety concerns.

Observation:

A total of 648 anonymous reports detailing events perceived as threats to patient safety were collected.
These reports encompassed any event that GPs felt should not have occurred and wished to prevent in the future, irrespective of fault or outcome.

Findings:

The collected reports provide a rich dataset of real-world patient safety incidents within Australian general practice.
Analysis of these events is expected to yield significant clinical lessons for healthcare professionals.

Implications:

The findings from the TAPS Study offer valuable insights for enhancing patient safety protocols in primary care settings.
Dissemination of clinical lessons derived from this study can contribute to a reduction in adverse events and improved healthcare quality.
This research underscores the importance of proactive reporting systems for identifying and mitigating patient safety risks.