Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Exploiting structure-activity relationships in docking.

David C Sullivan1, Eric J Martin

  • 1Department of Computer Aided Drug Discovery, Global Discovery Chemistry, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, 4560 Horton Street, Emeryville, California 94608, USA. davidxyz1972@yahoo.com

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
|April 11, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A diffusion model conditioned on compound bioactivity profiles for generating high-content images.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Comparing massively-multitask regression algorithms for drug discovery.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2026
Same author

Traumatic injury causes selective degeneration and TDP-43 mislocalization in human iPSC-derived <i>C9orf72</i>-associated ALS/FTD motor neurons.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2024
Same author

Enhancing the Small-Scale Screenable Biological Space beyond Known Chemogenomics Libraries with Gray Chemical Matter─Compounds with Novel Mechanisms from High-Throughput Screening Profiles.

ACS chemical biology·2024
Same author

Compound Activity Prediction with Dose-Dependent Transcriptomic Profiles and Deep Learning.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2024
Same author

Polyurethane Culture Substrates Enable Long-Term Neuron Monoculture in a Human <i>in vitro</i> Model of Neurotrauma.

Neurotrauma reports·2023
Same journal

Correction to "AstraMEV (AI-Guided Structural Assembly of Multi-Epitope Vaccines) Against Infectious Bronchitis Virus".

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

MolPy: A Large Language Model-Friendly Toolkit for Reactive Topology Editing in Polymer Simulations.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

Molecular Mechanisms of KIT Receptor Dimerization and Oncogenic Activation Revealed by Multiscale Simulations.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

Structural and Thermodynamic Discrimination between Agonists and Antagonists of Retinoic Acid Receptor γ and the Vitamin D Receptor.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

PACEff Builder: An Efficient Platform for Constructing PACE Hybrid-Resolution Models for Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Aqueous Protein, Peptide Assembly, and Membrane Protein Systems.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

TransKla: A Local-Global Cross-Attention Based Transformer Approach for Prediction of Lysine Lactylation Sites.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
See all related articles

Understanding errors in molecular docking predictions is key. This study separates prediction errors into noise and systematic parts, showing how quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models can improve accuracy and assess docking model reliability.

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • cheminformatics
  • drug discovery

Background:

  • Molecular docking is crucial for predicting drug-target interactions.
  • Docking score accuracy is limited by various error sources.
  • Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) models are used to correlate chemical structure with biological activity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the sources of error in molecular docking predictions.
  • To investigate the utility of 2D chemical descriptors and QSAR for improving docking accuracy.
  • To establish a framework for assessing the relative accuracy of different docking models.

Main Methods:

  • Decomposition of docking prediction error into noise and systematic components.
  • Application of 2D-QSAR models to docking scores.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of docking models from multiple crystal structures and scoring functions.

    • Main Results:

    • The error framework effectively explains improvements in docking accuracy achieved by fitting scores to QSAR equations.
    • The noise component of error is dominant when comparing different docking models for the same enzyme.
    • QSAR fit statistics can reliably rank the accuracy of docking score sets without experimental data.

    Conclusions:

    • A clear distinction between noise and systematic error in docking is essential for accurate predictions.
    • QSAR modeling offers a viable strategy to enhance docking accuracy and interpretability.
    • The proposed error framework and QSAR-based ranking provide valuable tools for selecting reliable docking models in drug discovery.