Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Perspectives on Neuroscience
Published on: July 31, 2007
Can neurological evidence help courts assess criminal responsibility? Lessons from law and neuroscience
Eyal Aharoni1, Chadd Funk, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong
1Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA. aharoni@psych.ucsb.edu
Abstract:
Can neurological evidence help courts assess criminal responsibility? To answer this question, we must first specify legal criteria for criminal responsibility and then ask how neurological findings can be used to determine whether particular defendants meet those criteria. Cognitive neuroscience may speak to at least two familiar conditions of criminal responsibility: intention and sanity. Functional neuroimaging studies in motor planning, awareness of actions, agency, social contract reasoning, and theory of mind, among others, have recently targeted a small assortment of brain networks thought to be instrumental in such determinations. Advances in each of these areas bring specificity to the problems underlying the application of neuroscience to criminal law.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Neural Regulation
Neuroplasticity
Role of Cerebellum and Prefrontal Cortex in Memory
Disorders of the Nervous Tissue
Homeostatic Imbalances:
Alzheimer's disease manifests as a gradual decline in memory and cognitive abilities, attributed to the buildup of amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles in the brain.
Parkinson's disease arises from the...
Language and Cognition
Higher Mental Functions of Brain: Learning and Memory

