Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Quality Control01:05

Quality Control

Quality control is one of the three cyclical quality assurance activities that help keep a system under statistical control. Typical quality control activities include creating quality control charts, conducting proficiency testing, and documenting and archiving results.
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...
Quality Assurance01:19

Quality Assurance

Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...
Control Systems01:10

Control Systems

Control systems are everywhere in contemporary society, influencing diverse applications from aerospace to automated manufacturing. These systems can be found naturally within biological processes, such as blood sugar regulation and heart rate adjustment in response to stress, as well as in man-made systems like elevators and automated vehicles. A control system is essentially a network of subsystems and processes that collaboratively convert specific inputs into desired outputs.
At the heart...
Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP)01:30

Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP)

Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) is a science-based, preventive system used globally to ensure food safety by identifying, evaluating, and controlling biological, chemical, and physical hazards throughout food production. Originally developed by NASA and the Pillsbury Company for astronaut food, HACCP is now a core component of the Codex Alimentarius.HACCP operates on prerequisite programs—such as Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs), sanitation procedures, and supplier...
Introduction to Statistical Process Control01:15

Introduction to Statistical Process Control

Statistical Process Control (SPC) is a method used to monitor and control quality within processes, particularly in manufacturing and service delivery, by employing statistical methods. SPC aims to distinguish between natural (common cause) variation and variation due to specific changes or events (special cause), allowing for timely improvements and sustained quality. The control chart, a pivotal tool in SPC, visually displays data over time alongside a central line of upper and lower control...
Response Surface Methodology01:16

Response Surface Methodology

Response Surface Methodology (RSM) is a collection of statistical and mathematical techniques used to develop, improve, and optimize processes. It is particularly valuable when many input variables or factors potentially influence a response variable.
The process of RSM involves several key steps:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessment of Physiological Responses During Field Science Task Performance: Feasibility and Future Needs.

Frontiers in physiology·2022
Same author

Electronic intracavitary brachytherapy quality management based on risk analysis: The report of AAPM TG 182.

Medical physics·2019
Same author

Considerations for developing chronic care system for traumatic brain injury based on comparisons of cancer survivorship and diabetes management care.

Ergonomics·2017
Same author

Community health integration through pharmacy process and ergonomics redesign (CHIPPER).

Ergonomics·2017
Same author

Delays and user performance in human-computer-network interaction tasks.

Human factors·2010
Same author

Knowledge sharing and expertise coordination of event response in organizations.

Applied ergonomics·2008
Same journal

Highly Variable, Complex, and Contextual: The Business of Radiation Oncology Practice.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to 'Radiation Therapy Promotes Hepatocellular Carcinoma Immune Cloaking via PD-L1 Upregulation Induced by cGAS-STING Activation' [International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics Volume 112, Issue 5, 1 April 2022, Pages 1243-1255].

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2026
Same journal

Multicenter external validation of normal tissue complication probability models for radiation-induced primary hypothyroidism in head and neck cancer survivors with long-term endocrine outcomes.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2026
Same journal

THGEM-Based Air Ionization Chamber for Online Dose Monitoring in Conventional and FLASH Radiotherapy.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2026
Same journal

Single Percussive Ventilation Breath-hold Imaging and Delivery in Lung Tumor Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy: Initial Observations From a Prospective Clinical Trial.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2026
Same journal

Proton beam therapy in nonmetastatic rhabdomyosarcoma: Outcome, prognostic factors and the effect of timing of radiation therapy.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control
05:47

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control

Published on: August 29, 2025

Tools for developing a quality management program: human factors and systems engineering tools.

Barrett S Caldwell1

  • 1School of Industrial Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA. bscaldwell@purdue.edu

International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
|May 24, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study highlights how human factors and systems engineering can improve healthcare by analyzing adverse events and team coordination. Understanding event dynamics and recovery methods enhances patient care and system performance.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control
05:47

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control

Published on: August 29, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Human Factors and Systems Engineering in Healthcare
  • Patient Safety and Quality Improvement
  • Healthcare Operations Research

Background:

  • Growing acceptance of interdisciplinary partnerships between medical teams and engineers.
  • Application of human factors and systems engineering to analyze healthcare processes.
  • Need for novel approaches to causal analyses and recovery from adverse events.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify opportunities for reducing adverse events and improving performance in healthcare settings.
  • To emphasize studying human behavior that enhances system performance.
  • To improve understanding of event dynamics and their influence on provider tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing human factors and systems engineering descriptions of process flows and operational sequences.
  • Analyzing a range of factors affecting adverse events, beyond sole emphasis on human error.
  • Collaborating with the Regenstrief Center for Healthcare Engineering to refine healthcare task taxonomies.

Main Results:

  • Enhanced understanding of how event dynamics influence provider tasks and constraints.
  • Identification of opportunities for reducing adverse events and improving system performance.
  • Examination of team coordination tasks' impact on patient care and quality management.

Conclusions:

  • Interdisciplinary collaboration is key to improving healthcare safety and performance.
  • A balanced evaluation of adverse events requires novel causal analyses and recovery methods.
  • Team coordination activities are critical for patient care and quality, despite often being undervalued.