Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...
Odds Ratio01:09

Odds Ratio

The odds ratio (OR) is a statistical measure used extensively in epidemiology and research to quantify the strength of association between exposure and outcome across different groups. Unlike relative risk, which compares the probabilities of an event occurring, the odds ratio compares the odds of an event occurring in the exposed group to the odds of it occurring in the unexposed group. The odds, in this context, are calculated as the probability of the event happening divided by the...
McNemar's Test01:23

McNemar's Test

McNemar's Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there is a significant difference in proportions between two related groups when the outcome is binary (e.g., yes/no, success/failure). It is beneficial when we have paired data, such as pre-test/post-test designs, where the same subjects are measured under two different conditions. The test is named after the statistician Quinn McNemar, who introduced it in 1947. It is commonly used in situations where subjects are...
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Kaplan-Meier Approach01:24

Kaplan-Meier Approach

The Kaplan-Meier estimator is a non-parametric method used to estimate the survival function from time-to-event data. In medical research, it is frequently employed to measure the proportion of patients surviving for a certain period after treatment. This estimator is fundamental in analyzing time-to-event data, making it indispensable in clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and reliability engineering. By estimating survival probabilities, researchers can evaluate treatment effectiveness,...
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evidence for Evidence-Based Medicine - A Call for Some Theory and a New Problem.

NEJM evidence·2026
Same author

Age-Friendly Health System Implementation in Outpatient Settings: A Systematic Review.

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society·2026
Same author

Differences in Bladder Cancer Diagnosis by Demographic Factors: A Simulation Modeling Analysis.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Understanding Bladder Cancer Screening Limits Through Comparative Modeling: The Maximum Clinical Incidence Reduction (MCLIR) Methodology.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Fiber intake and laxation in people with normal bowel function: a systematic review.

The American journal of clinical nutrition·2026
Same author

On Representations and Quantifications of Uncertainty.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 5, 2026

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
08:36

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Published on: April 19, 2024

A method for the meta-analysis of mutually exclusive binary outcomes.

Thomas A Trikalinos1, Ingram Olkin

  • 1Center for Clinical Evidence Synthesis, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St, Box #63, Boston, MA 02111, USA. ttrikalin@mac.com

Statistics in Medicine
|April 18, 2008
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces methods for meta-analyses of mutually exclusive outcomes, accounting for negative correlations to improve effect size estimation. Accurate analysis of binary data meta-analyses is crucial for reliable results.

More Related Videos

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 5, 2026

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
08:36

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Published on: April 19, 2024

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Research Methodology
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Meta-analyses often involve multiple outcomes, requiring consideration of within-study correlations.
  • Mutually exclusive and exhaustive dichotomous outcomes present unique challenges in meta-analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and present fixed-effects and random-effects methods for meta-analyses of mutually exclusive dichotomous outcomes.
  • To provide formulae for various effect size measures (odds ratio, risk ratio, risk difference) that account for negative correlations.
  • To demonstrate the application of these methods using a real-world example from breast cancer trials.

Main Methods:

  • Development of statistical methods to incorporate negative correlations between effect sizes of mutually exclusive outcomes.
  • Application of fixed-effects and random-effects models.
  • Calculation of simultaneous confidence intervals for marginal and relative effect sizes.
  • Utilizing a multinomial setting for optimal analysis of binary data meta-analyses with mutually exclusive outcomes.

Main Results:

  • The proposed methods yield correct simultaneous confidence intervals for effect sizes.
  • Formulae for odds ratio, risk ratio, risk difference, and arcsin-transformed risk differences are provided.
  • An example meta-analysis of breast cancer trials demonstrates the practical application and benefits of accounting for correlations.

Conclusions:

  • Accounting for negative correlations in meta-analyses of mutually exclusive outcomes is essential for accurate effect size estimation.
  • A multinomial framework is recommended for optimal analysis of such data.
  • While covariances may be small in large samples, exploring robustness is advised.