Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Antiplatelet therapy mitigates cardiac remodeling and dysfunction in congestive heart failure due to myocardial
Santosh K Sanganalmath1, Judit Barta, Nobuakira Takeda
1Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, St. Boniface General Hospital Research Centre, 351 Tache Avenue, and Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R2H2A6, Canada.
Insights
Sarpogrelate and cilostazol improve cardiac function after myocardial infarction. However, cilostazol increased arrhythmias and mortality, while sarpogrelate did not, suggesting differential safety profiles in heart failure management.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Pharmacology
- Heart Failure Research
- Myocardial Infarction Therapeutics
Background:
- Peripheral vascular disease is often managed with antiplatelet agents like sarpogrelate (SAR) and cilostazol (CIL).
- Congestive heart failure (CHF) following myocardial infarction (MI) involves cardiac remodeling and impaired function.
- The efficacy of SAR and CIL in mitigating post-MI cardiac remodeling and dysfunction requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To test the hypothesis that both SAR and CIL prevent cardiac remodeling and improve cardiac function in rats with MI-induced CHF.
- To compare the effects of SAR and CIL on cardiac function, arrhythmias, and mortality post-MI.
Main Methods:
- Post-MI rats were treated with vehicle, SAR, or CIL for 35 days.
- Sham-operated rats served as controls.
- Electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and hemodynamic parameters were assessed at day 56.
Main Results:
- Both SAR and CIL significantly improved left ventricular dimensions, systolic and diastolic function, and cardiac output.
- Neither agent affected infarct size or QTc prolongation, though cardiac hypertrophy was reduced.
- SAR decreased ventricular arrhythmias, while CIL increased them; SAR showed a trend towards decreased mortality, whereas CIL trended towards increased mortality.
Conclusions:
- Both sarpogrelate and cilostazol demonstrate cardioprotective effects, preventing cardiac remodeling and improving function in MI-induced CHF.
- Sarpogrelate appears to have a more favorable safety profile regarding arrhythmias and mortality compared to cilostazol in this model.
- These findings suggest differential therapeutic benefits and risks associated with these agents in managing heart failure post-myocardial infarction.
Abstract:
Antiplatelet agents such as sarpogrelate (SAR), a 5-hydroxytryptamine antagonist, and cilostazol (CIL), a phosphodiesterase-III inhibitor, are used in the management of peripheral vascular disease. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that both SAR and CIL prevent cardiac remodeling and improve cardiac function in congestive heart failure (CHF) due to myocardial infarction (MI). Post-MI rats (3 weeks after the occlusion of coronary artery) received either vehicle (MI+V, n = 36), SAR (MI+SAR; 5 mg xc kg(-1) x day(-1), n = 35) or CIL (MI+CIL; 5 mg x kg(-1) x day(-1), n = 34) from day 21 to day 56. Sham-operated rats (n = 29) served as controls. Electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and hemodynamic parameters were measured on day 56. Treatment of infarcted animals with SAR or CIL significantly improved the left ventricular (LV) dimensions, LV fractional shortening, cardiac output, stroke volume, mean arterial pressure, LV diastolic function, and LV systolic pressure, as well as rates of LV pressure development and pressure decay. Although cardiac hypertrophy was reduced, both SAR and CIL had no effect on infarct size or MI-associated QTc prolongation. However, SAR decreased whereas CIL increased the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias and the mean number of episodes in infarcted animals. Mortality during the treatment period was decreased by 17% with SAR and increased by 10% with CIL, but these changes were not significant statistically. The data in this study suggest that both SAR and CIL prevent cardiac remodeling and improve cardiac function in MI-induced CHF; however, CIL unlike SAR increased the incidence of arrhythmias and adversely affected patient mortality.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Myocarditis III: Medical Management