Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2026

07:41
Performing Data Mining And Integrative Analysis Of Biomarker in Breast Cancer Using Multiple Publicly Accessible Databases
Published on: May 17, 2019
Predictive gene lists for breast cancer prognosis: a topographic visualisation study
Mingmanas Sivaraksa1, David Lowe
1Neural Computing Research Group, Aston University, Birmingham, UK. sivarakm@aston.ac.uk
BMC Medical Genomics
|April 19, 2008
Summary
Predictive gene lists (PGLs) from small gene subsets in high-dimensional data lack prognostic dissimilarity for reliable patient classification. This uncertainty means many patients are unclassifiable, necessitating new approaches in medical decision support systems.
Area of Science:
- Bioinformatics
- Computational Biology
- Genomics
Background:
- The non-uniqueness of predictive gene lists (PGLs) from small gene subsets in high-dimensional genomic data is a recognized challenge.
- Existing discriminative models often struggle with random correlations in sparse model selection.
- This study explores an alternative approach using unsupervised patient-specific nonlinear topographic projection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the prognostic dissimilarity within patient-specific PGLs using nonlinear dimensionality reduction techniques.
- To assess the separability of patient prognosis groups based on gene expression profiles.
- To evaluate the generalizability of projection methods for follow-up studies.
Main Methods:
- Nonlinear topographic projection maps were constructed using Neuroscale, Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (SNE), and Locally Linear Embedding (LLE).
- Two-dimensional visualization plots were generated for 70-dimensional PGLs.
- Classifiers were developed to identify prognosis indicators and test group separability.
Main Results:
- Small subsets of patient-specific PGLs demonstrated insufficient prognostic dissimilarity for clear patient grouping.
- Uncertainty and diversity in gene expression profiles hindered unambiguous patient classification.
- Comparative projections across different PGLs yielded consistent results, reinforcing classification limitations.
Conclusions:
- Random correlations from small subset selection in high-dimensional data introduce uncertainty, precluding robust discriminative classifiers.
- Patient gene expression profiles may inform treatment planning based on collective patient responses.
- Many patients are intrinsically unclassifiable based on current PGL evidence, requiring accommodation in medical decision support systems to avoid errors and overtreatment.

