Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2026

A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents
Published on: November 21, 2019
Notes on a cautionary (tall) tale about respondent-driven sampling: a critique of Scott's ethnography
1University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA. robert.broadhead@uconn.edu
Abstract:
Serious methodological and ethical flaws are detailed in an ethnographic study of a respondent-driven sampling (RDS) project for drug users in Chicago. The study is also disconnected from the larger social context within which the project operated, and from the existing literature on human-subject problems the author claims he "discovered" about RDS - problems common to traditional outreach projects that researchers have known about and managed successfully for years. Due to an admitted bias in the author's sampling, and an eagerness to accept respondents' claims uncritically, the author's results are not generalizeable to RDS projects operating in other cities, in Chicago itself, or even to the specific project studied.
Related Concept Videos
Social Proof
Surveys
Naturalistic Observations
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
Social Loafing
Ethics in Research