Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Human mutation databases.

Ourania Horaitis1, Richard G H Cotton

  • 1Genomic Disorders Research Centre, St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne Fitzroy, Australia.

Current Protocols in Bioinformatics
|April 23, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Coping with esophageal cancer approaches worldwide.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2014
Same author

Capture of somatic mtDNA point mutations with severe effects on oxidative phosphorylation in synaptosome cybrid clones from human brain.

Human mutation·2014
Same author

DNA variant databases improve test accuracy and phenotype prediction in Alport syndrome.

Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)·2013
Same author

Tetrahydrobiopterin, its mode of action on phenylalanine hydroxylase, and importance of genotypes for pharmacological therapy of phenylketonuria.

Human mutation·2013
Same author

Human Variome Project country nodes: documenting genetic information within a country.

Human mutation·2012
Same author

Towards an Ecology of Collective Innovation: Human Variome Project (HVP), Rare Disease Consortium for Autosomal Loci (RaDiCAL) and Data-Enabled Life Sciences Alliance (DELSA).

Current pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine·2012
Same journal

Protein Sequence Analysis Using the MPI Bioinformatics Toolkit.

Current protocols in bioinformatics·2020
Same journal

Exploring Manually Curated Annotations of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins with DisProt.

Current protocols in bioinformatics·2020
Same journal

Network Building with the Cytoscape BioGateway App Explained in Five Use Cases.

Current protocols in bioinformatics·2020
Same journal

Expanding the Perseus Software for Omics Data Analysis With Custom Plugins.

Current protocols in bioinformatics·2020
Same journal

Exploring Non-Coding RNAs in RNAcentral.

Current protocols in bioinformatics·2020
Same journal

How to Illuminate the Dark Proteome Using the Multi-omic OpenProt Resource.

Current protocols in bioinformatics·2020
See all related articles

This guide compares mutation databases, covering data submission, access, and construction best practices for researchers. It aims to improve the usability and reliability of genetic mutation information.

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Mutation databases are crucial for understanding genetic variation and disease.
  • Standardized approaches for data submission and access are needed.
  • Effective database construction is essential for reliable mutation data management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare general and locus-specific mutation databases.
  • To provide guidance on submitting and accessing mutation data.
  • To offer advice on constructing robust mutation databases.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of existing mutation databases.
  • Review of data submission protocols.
  • Guidelines for data retrieval and querying.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Principles for database design and implementation.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified key differences between general and locus-specific mutation databases.
    • Outlined best practices for data submission and quality control.
    • Provided strategies for efficient mutation data access.
    • Recommended approaches for sustainable database construction.

    Conclusions:

    • Effective management of mutation data requires careful consideration of database type, submission protocols, and access methods.
    • Standardized practices enhance data sharing and research reproducibility.
    • Guidance on database construction promotes long-term data integrity and utility.