Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
Published on: December 24, 2015
[The O. J. Simpson case. Guilty or innocent?]
Anita Gałeska-Sliwka1, Ewa Wolska
1Z Zakładu Podstaw Prawa Medycznego Collegium Medicum im. L. Rydygiera w Bydgoszczy, Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu.
Abstract:
On October 3, 1995, one hundred million of Americans gathered at their TV sets to learn the verdict in the ex-football player O. J. Simpson case. The verdict was the consequence of a skilful defense and numerous mistakes made by prosecution. Despite copious evidence, including DNA test results indicating the guilt of thedefendant, the jury decided that O. J. Simpson was not guilty. The aim of this paper is to present the unique character of this trial and defense strategy used by a group of six attorneys, who worked on that case.
Related Concept Videos
Simpson's Rule II
Simpson's Rule I
Torts II
Torts III
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.
Torts I
Intentional...
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function like a...

