Effectiveness of physical therapy interventions for children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review

Heidi Anttila1, Ilona Autti-Rämö, Jutta Suoranta

  • 1Finnish Office for Health Technology Assessment (FinOHTA), at the National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health (STAKES), PO Box 220, FIN-00531 Helsinki, Finland. heidi.anttila@stakes.fi

BMC Pediatrics
|April 26, 2008
PubMed

Insights

Physical therapy (PT) interventions show moderate evidence of effectiveness for upper extremity function in children with cerebral palsy (CP). However, more high-quality trials are needed to confirm benefits for other functional areas.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatrics
  • Rehabilitation Medicine
  • Neurology

Background:

  • Cerebral palsy (CP) is a complex developmental disorder affecting movement and posture.
  • Physical therapy (PT) plays a crucial role in managing functional deficits in children with CP.
  • Assessing the evidence-based effectiveness of various PT interventions is vital for optimizing care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating PT interventions for children with CP.
  • To assess the impact of these interventions on various aspects of functioning.

Main Methods:

  • Comprehensive literature search of major databases (Medline, Cinahl, PEDro, Cochrane Library) from 1990 to 2007.
  • Inclusion of only RCTs focusing on PT interventions in diagnosed pediatric CP cases.
  • Data extraction and methodological quality assessment by two independent reviewers, with outcomes classified using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).

Main Results:

  • Twenty-two RCTs were identified, categorized into eight intervention types.
  • Moderate evidence supports the effectiveness of upper extremity treatments (including prehensile hand treatment and neurodevelopmental therapy) and constraint-induced therapy for specific functional gains.
  • Moderate evidence indicated ineffectiveness of strength training for walking speed and stride length, with conflicting results for gross motor function.

Conclusions:

  • Limited high-quality evidence exists for most PT interventions in pediatric CP due to methodological limitations and study variations.
  • Moderate evidence supports the effectiveness of certain upper extremity training approaches.
  • Further well-designed RCTs are essential to establish robust evidence for targeted PT interventions in children with CP.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos