Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Splenectomy In Children: A Case Report with Literature Review
Published on: March 27, 2026
[Medical and/or surgical treatment of appendicular mass and appendicular abscess in children]
J A Blanco Domínguez1, R M Isnard Planchar, J Ilari Rocabert
1Sevicio de Cirugía Pediátrica, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona.
Insights
For acute appendicitis with appendicular mass or abscess, initial medical treatment with antibiotics is recommended. Delayed appendectomy, often via laparoscopy, is safe and effective, avoiding immediate surgery unless intestinal obstruction is present.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Surgical Oncology
- Emergency Medicine
Context:
- Acute appendicitis with appendicular mass or abscess presents a treatment dilemma regarding immediate versus delayed intervention.
- Controversy exists on whether to pursue medical or surgical management initially.
- The necessity and timing of interval appendectomy after conservative treatment require clarification.
Purpose:
- To evaluate the outcomes of conservative (medical) versus immediate surgical treatment for appendicular mass and/or abscess.
- To determine the safety and efficacy of delayed appendectomy after successful medical management.
- To establish criteria for implementing treatment strategies for appendicular mass and abscess.
Summary:
- A retrospective review of 10 cases of appendicular mass (6.49% of appendicitis cases) between 2003-2005 was conducted.
- Initial diagnosis was often misattributed (60% to gastroenteritis), with a 5-day average delay to definitive diagnosis.
- Conservative management with antibiotics was successful in most cases, with delayed interval appendectomy (average 5.5 months) performed in 70% of patients without complications.
Impact:
- Non-operative management with antibiotics is effective for appendicular mass/abscess, resolving acute symptoms and preventing complications.
- Delayed interval appendectomy, preferably laparoscopic, is a safe and viable option, avoiding immediate surgical risks.
- This approach allows for de-escalation of treatment and can be implemented unless intestinal obstruction is present.
Background:
There is controversy about the immediate or delayed treatment of the cases of acute appendicitis which are diagnosed in the form of appendicular mass and/or apendicular abscess. At first, do we have to follow a medical or a surgical treatment? In those cases of conservative treatment, do we always have to carry out a delayed appendectomy? We have revised our experience to discuss the different options in order to try to define some implementation criteria.
Material And Methods:
We have revised the cases of appendicitis from January 2003 to December 2005, choosing the cases of appendicular mass on this study. We have assessed the following parameters: age, sex, days of evolution, previous diagnostic, hemogram, PCR, ultrasound, computer tomography (TAC), medical treatment, initial surgical treatment, period of treatment and types of antibiotic, surgical treatment in a second term and pathological anatomy. From the 154 appendicular processes, 10 patients were diagnosed of appendicular mass, which means 6.49%.
Results:
From the 154 appendicular processes, 10 patients were diagnosed of appendicular plastron, which means 6.49%. The age range is between 2 and 15 (average 6,9). There are no differences regarding sex, 50% each. The initial diagnosis in 60% of the cases was sharp gastroenteritis. The average of days of evolution until the definitive diagnosis was 5 days (between 1 and 10 days). In 90% of the cases the diagnosis was confirmed through ultrasound scan and two cases needed computerized tomography (CT). In two cases we had to carry out an initial surgical operation to drain the abscess. The appendectomy in a second term was carried out in 7 cases. Three cases still await operation.
Conclusions:
Unless there is intestinal occlusion, in those patients with tender mass or appendicular abscess, we must start a medical treatment based on antibiotics and, later on, carry out the appendectomy through laparoscopy. In the period between the sharp symptoms and the definitive operation, there have not been any further complications or pathology related to the appendicular mass, despite the fact that the operations have taken place 5.5 months later on average. A proper antibiotic treatment always solves the sharp symptoms. On few occasions, besides the initial medical treatment, we have to act surgically to drain an abscess, especially on Douglas.
Related Concept Videos
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
Appendicitis
Appendicitis-I: Introduction
Etiology: Appendicitis can arise from various causes, primarily rooted in the obstruction of the appendix lumen. Factors contributing to this obstruction include fecal accumulation, lymphoid hyperplasia and, in...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
