Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...

Nursing Evaluation

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations:

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...

Critical Thinking II

Critical Thinking II

Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching II: Planning and Implementation

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching II: Planning and Implementation

Planning for learning involves the development of a teaching plan. Teaching plans are similar to nursing care plans—both follow the steps of the nursing process. Planning in the teaching process involves setting goals and outcomes. Here, goals identify what a patient needs to achieve to understand a healthcare topic better, whereas the outcomes are the action to be performed by the patient to achieve the goal within a timeframe. For example, if the goal is to educate the patient about insulin...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Integrating care in a children's hospital: a qualitative interview study with mental and physical health professionals in England.

BMJ open·2026

Same author

Trends in mental health referrals before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: retrospective population-based service evaluation in a single NHS trust.

BJPsych open·2026

Same author

Preparing New Clinical Educators: 10-Year Outcomes of a Hybrid Program.

The Journal of nursing education·2023

Same author

Examining the Impact of a Nursing Course Redesign on Student Outcomes, Faculty Workload, and Costs.

Nursing education perspectives·2022

Same author

Increasing the Number of Faculty With CNE® Certification: A Statewide Initiative.

Nursing education perspectives·2021

Same author

Advocacy, Collaboration, and Conflict Management: Teaching Core Skill Sets in Mental Health Nursing.

Journal of psychosocial nursing and mental health services·2021

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 5, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Developing a practical evaluation tool for preceptor use.

Catherine M Walsh¹, Lisa A Seldomridge, Karen K Badros

¹Department of Nursing, Salisbury University, Salisbury, Maryland 21801, USA. cmwalsh@salisbury.edu

|May 6, 2008

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

A new tool for evaluating undergraduate clinical performance faced issues with high ratings and rating disparities. Revisions focused on observable indicators and a rubric, with recommendations for improved preceptor training and feedback.

More Related Videos

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 5, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Area of Science:

Medical Education
Clinical Assessment
Healthcare Professional Training

Background:

Existing clinical performance evaluation tools for undergraduate students were unsatisfactory.
Preceptors' input was incorporated into the development of a new evaluation instrument.
A 2-year pilot study highlighted significant challenges with the initial version of the tool.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop and refine an evaluation tool for undergraduate clinical performance based on preceptor feedback.
To address issues of excessively high ratings and disparities between faculty and preceptor evaluations.
To improve the reliability and validity of clinical performance assessments.

Main Methods:

A novel evaluation instrument was co-designed with preceptors.
A 2-year pilot evaluation was conducted to identify performance issues.
The instrument was revised based on pilot data, focusing on observable indicators and incorporating a rubric.

Main Results:

Initial pilot evaluations showed excessively high ratings from preceptors.
Significant disparities were observed between faculty and preceptor ratings.
Revisions reduced evaluation indicators to those directly observable in daily practice.

Conclusions:

The revised evaluation tool, with a focus on observable indicators and a rubric, aims to improve clinical performance assessment.
Enhanced preceptor orientation, guidance, and modified feedback procedures are recommended to further enhance rating quality.
Continuous refinement of assessment tools is crucial for accurate evaluation of student clinical performance.