Precision, time, and cost: a comparison of three sampling designs in an emergency setting
Megan Deitchler1, Hedwig Deconinck, Gilles Bergeron
1Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance Project, Academy for Educational Development, 1825 Connecticut Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20009, USA. mdeitchl@aed.org
Abstract:
The conventional method to collect data on the health, nutrition, and food security status of a population affected by an emergency is a 30 x 30 cluster survey. This sampling method can be time and resource intensive and, accordingly, may not be the most appropriate one when data are needed rapidly for decision making. In this study, we compare the precision, time and cost of the 30 x 30 cluster survey with two alternative sampling designs: a 33 x 6 cluster design (33 clusters, 6 observations per cluster) and a 67 x 3 cluster design (67 clusters, 3 observations per cluster). Data for each sampling design were collected concurrently in West Darfur, Sudan in September-October 2005 in an emergency setting. Results of the study show the 30 x 30 design to provide more precise results (i.e. narrower 95% confidence intervals) than the 33 x 6 and 67 x 3 design for most child-level indicators. Exceptions are indicators of immunization and vitamin A capsule supplementation coverage which show a high intra-cluster correlation. Although the 33 x 6 and 67 x 3 designs provide wider confidence intervals than the 30 x 30 design for child anthropometric indicators, the 33 x 6 and 67 x 3 designs provide the opportunity to conduct a LQAS hypothesis test to detect whether or not a critical threshold of global acute malnutrition prevalence has been exceeded, whereas the 30 x 30 design does not. For the household-level indicators tested in this study, the 67 x 3 design provides the most precise results. However, our results show that neither the 33 x 6 nor the 67 x 3 design are appropriate for assessing indicators of mortality. In this field application, data collection for the 33 x 6 and 67 x 3 designs required substantially less time and cost than that required for the 30 x 30 design. The findings of this study suggest the 33 x 6 and 67 x 3 designs can provide useful time- and resource-saving alternatives to the 30 x 30 method of data collection in emergency settings.
Related Concept Videos
Sampling Plans
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Introduction To Survival Analysis
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time until a...
Random Sampling Method
Cluster Sampling Method
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
Sampling Methods: Overview
In analytical chemistry, the choice of sampling...


