Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2026

06:48
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
Human uniqueness-self-interest and social cooperation.
Daijiro Okada1, Paul M Bingham
1Institute for Advanced Study, Einstein Drive, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA. okada@econ.rutgers.edu
Journal of Theoretical Biology
|May 9, 2008
Summary
Human cooperation evolved through a unique capacity for low-cost violence, enabling strategic coercion. This evolutionary advantage explains human uniqueness and our ecological dominance.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary biology
- Game theory
- Anthropology
Background:
- Human ecological dominance and unique traits stem from intense social cooperation.
- Explaining the evolutionary origins of human social cooperation is a significant scientific challenge.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose and analyze a hypothesis for the ancestral origin of expanded cooperative social behavior in humans.
- To demonstrate how specific conditions could make enhanced social cooperation strategically viable.
Main Methods:
- Game theoretic analysis to model social cooperation dynamics.
- Examination of the role of conspecific violence and its cost-reduction properties.
Main Results:
- Expanded social cooperation is viable when individuals possess a specific capacity for low-cost conspecific violence (credible threat).
- Reduced costs of coercion enable preemptive or compensated coercion as a self-interested behavior.
- Humans uniquely evolved coercive capabilities meeting these stringent requirements.
Conclusions:
- The evolution of human-like social cooperation may have been initiated by a novel capacity for coercive threat.
- This evolutionary pathway accounts for the unique features of human societies and the fossil record.
Related Concept Videos
Egoism and Altruism
Voluntary behavior with the intent to help other people is called prosocial behavior. Why do people help other people? Is personal benefit such as feeling good about oneself the only reason people help one another?
Humanistic Psychology
Humanistic psychology emerged in the mid-20th century as a response to the deterministic and pessimistic nature of behaviorism and psychoanalysis. While behaviorism focused on observable behaviors influenced by the environment and psychoanalysis delved into unconscious motivations, both theories suggested that human actions lacked free will. In contrast, humanistic psychology offers a perspective that emphasizes the innate potential for goodness and growth within every individual.
This approach...
This approach...
Personal Identity
Personal identity is the deeply felt sense of self that individuals cultivate over time, intricately woven from intrinsic qualities they consider essential to their existence—qualities such as morality, intelligence, and friendliness. These attributes serve as vital internal benchmarks, guiding individuals in evaluating whether their actions resonate with their true selves.When personal identity takes center stage in one's life, individuals often emphasize their distinctiveness, highlighting...
Carl Rogers' Humanistic Perspective on Personality
Carl Rogers, a key figure in humanistic psychology, believed that individuals possess an innate potential for growth and fulfillment. According to his model of personality, three significant components define an individual: the organism, the self, and conditions of worth.
The organism refers to an individual's inherent blueprint, which Rogers saw as innately positive and directed toward helping others, unlike Freud's view of the id as driven by base impulses. The self is a person's...
The organism refers to an individual's inherent blueprint, which Rogers saw as innately positive and directed toward helping others, unlike Freud's view of the id as driven by base impulses. The self is a person's...
Altruism
Altruistic behaviors are “unselfish” behaviors—those that help another individual at the expense of the individual carrying out the behavior. Despite the negative consequences for the altruistic animal, these behaviors are thought to have evolved for several reasons.
Self Within Cultural Contexts
Cultural frameworks for understanding the self are often categorized into two broad orientations: individualism and collectivism. These paradigms influence how people define themselves, relate to others, and interpret their social worlds. Each orientation offers distinct perspectives on autonomy, responsibility, and the role of the individual within a community.Individualistic CulturesIn individualistic cultures like North America and Western Europe, identity is understood as autonomous and...
