Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2026
16:24
Analyzing and Building Nucleic Acid Structures with 3DNA
Published on: April 26, 2013
Calculating stacking interactions in nucleic acid base-pair steps using spin-component scaling and local second order
1School of Chemistry, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics : PCCP
|May 10, 2008
Summary
Density-fitted local second-order Møller-Plesset perturbation theory (DF-LMP2) methods were used to calculate DNA base-pair stacking energies. A new reference data method was developed, showing DF-SCSN-LMP2 accurately predicts these energies.
Area of Science:
- Computational Chemistry
- Molecular Modeling
- Biophysics
Background:
- Accurate calculation of stacking interaction energies in DNA is crucial for understanding its structure and function.
- Existing computational methods have limitations in precisely determining these energies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compute stacking interaction energies for B-DNA base-pair steps using various DF-LMP2 methods.
- To develop a more reliable reference data set for these interaction energies.
- To evaluate the performance of DF-LMP2 variants, including SCS and SCSN, against this new reference.
Main Methods:
- Density-fitted local second-order Møller-Plesset perturbation theory (DF-LMP2) was employed.
- Spin-component scaled (SCS) and spin-component scaled for nucleobases (SCSN) variants of DF-LMP2 were utilized.
- A novel extrapolation method was developed to create accurate reference interaction energies, avoiding many-body corrections and improving basis set limit estimation.
Main Results:
- Comparison with existing reference data revealed discrepancies for SCS variants.
- The new reference data set consistently showed interaction energies approximately 1 kcal mol(-1) lower than previous literature values.
- DF-SCSN-LMP2/aug-cc-pVTZ demonstrated high accuracy, reproducing the new reference energies with a root mean square error of 0.71 kcal mol(-1).
- The SCS variant was found to consistently underestimate the binding energy.
Conclusions:
- The developed extrapolation method provides a more reliable reference for DNA base-pair stacking energies.
- DF-SCSN-LMP2 is a highly accurate method for calculating these energies.
- The SCS variant should be used with caution due to its tendency to underestimate binding energies.
More Related Videos
09:17Structure-Based Simulation and Sampling of Transcription Factor Protein Movements along DNA from Atomic-Scale Stepping to Coarse-Grained Diffusion
Published on: March 1, 2022
12:11Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
Published on: April 8, 2020
Related Concept Videos
01:08Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must have a...
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must have a...
01:02¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals
Spin systems where the difference in chemical shifts of the coupled nuclei is greater than ten times J are called first-order spin systems. These nuclei are weakly coupled, and their chemical shifts and coupling constant can generally be estimated from the well-separated signals in the spectrum.
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are slanted or...
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are slanted or...
01:22Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
01:20Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
01:27¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling
The coupling interactions of nuclei across four or more bonds are usually weak, with J values less than 1 Hz. While these are usually not observed in spectra, the presence of multiple bonds along the coupling pathway can result in observable long-range coupling.
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene π orbitals.
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene π orbitals.
01:13¹H NMR: Complex Splitting
A proton M that is coupled to a proton X results in doublet signals for M. However, NMR-active nuclei can be simultaneously coupled to more than one nonequivalent nucleus. When M is coupled to a second proton A, such as in styrene oxide, each peak in the doublet is split into another doublet.
Splitting diagrams or splitting tree diagrams are routinely used to depict such complex couplings. While drawing splitting diagrams, the splitting with the larger coupling constant is usually applied first.
Splitting diagrams or splitting tree diagrams are routinely used to depict such complex couplings. While drawing splitting diagrams, the splitting with the larger coupling constant is usually applied first.