Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Liver tumor imaging.

J T Ferrucci1

  • 1Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114.

Cancer
|February 15, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Choosing the best liver tumor imaging involves weighing multiple techniques like CT and MRI. The optimal approach depends on patient specifics and local resources, leading to institution-specific diagnostic strategies.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Introduction: rationale for colorectal cancer screening.

Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR·2001
Same author

Colon cancer screening with virtual colonoscopy: promise, polyps, politics.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2001
Same author

Noninvasive imaging of the biliary ducts.

Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract·2001
Same author

CT colonography for colorectal cancer screening: lessons from mammography.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2000
Same author

Virtual colonoscopy--technique and applications.

Italian journal of gastroenterology and hepatology·2000
Same author

Periventricular leukomalacia: relationship between lateral ventricular volume on brain MR images and severity of cognitive and motor impairment.

Radiology·2000
Same journal

Toward exercise as standard care for older cancer survivors.

Cancer·2026
Same journal

Maintenance therapy in gynecologic malignancies: Current and future state.

Cancer·2026
Same journal

Long-term outcomes of evolving treatment regimens in Ewing sarcoma survivors diagnosed 1970-1999: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.

Cancer·2026
Same journal

Large-scale osteosarcoma sequencing reveals age-associated genomic architectures.

Cancer·2026
Same journal

EZH2 inhibitor tazemetostat voluntarily withdrawn from market.

Cancer·2026
Same journal

Nivolumab and chemotherapy combination approved for previously untreated Hodgkin lymphoma.

Cancer·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Liver tumor diagnosis relies on advanced imaging technologies.
  • Multiple imaging modalities are available globally, including ultrasound, CT, and MRI.
  • Specialized techniques like CTAP and IOUS aid in staging known liver cancer.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss the challenges in liver tumor imaging decision-making.
  • To review current imaging modalities for liver tumors.
  • To highlight factors influencing the choice of imaging techniques.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current literature on liver tumor imaging.
  • Discussion of various imaging modalities: ultrasound (US), radionuclide scintigraphy (RNS), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), CT during arterial portography (CTAP), and intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of factors affecting imaging selection.

    • Main Results:

    • Computed tomography (CT) is widely considered the gold standard for liver tumor imaging.
    • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a preferred alternative for some specialists.
    • Selection and sequencing of imaging studies are significantly influenced by local factors such as equipment, expertise, and patient clinical circumstances.

    Conclusions:

    • There is no single universal algorithm for liver tumor imaging.
    • Diagnostic decision-making is complex, influenced by technological abundance and individual patient factors.
    • Institution-specific diagnostic algorithms are common due to the variability in resources and clinical needs.