Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Problems01:24

Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Problems

The empirical approach to drug therapy optimization relies on correlating pharmacological response with administered dosage. Such an approach can be costly, time-consuming, and often yields poor correlation due to variables like formulation factors and drug elimination characteristics. A more precise approach correlates response with plasma drug concentration or the amount of drug in the body, rather than dosage. This is achieved through pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling, which...
Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Model Components01:14

Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Model Components

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK–PD) modeling is essential in drug development and clinical pharmacology. It provides a quantitative framework to predict drug behavior and response over time. This approach integrates pharmacokinetics (PK), which describes the drug's absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion, with pharmacodynamics (PD), which characterizes the drug’s biological effects and mechanisms of action.The disposition kinetics of a drug determine its plasma...
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation01:24

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation

This lesson introduces two critical methods in pharmacokinetics, the Wagner-Nelson and Loo-Riegelman methods, used for estimating the absorption rate constant (ka) for drugs administered via non-intravenous routes. The Wagner-Nelson method relates ka to the plasma concentration derived from the slope of a semilog percent unabsorbed time plot. However, it is limited to drugs with one-compartment kinetics and can be impacted by factors like gastrointestinal motility or enzymatic degradation.
On...
Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Assumption with Protein Binding01:13

Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Assumption with Protein Binding

Physiological models with protein binding in pharmacokinetics offer a sophisticated approach to understanding drug disposition. These models consider drug-protein interactions, enabling them to effectively predict drug concentrations in different organs and tissues. This precision aids in accurate drug dosing, providing a significant advantage over conventional models. A key process within these models is equilibration, which ensures that drug concentrations achieve a steady state within the...
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models01:06

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models

Pharmacokinetic models are mathematical constructs that represent and predict the time course of drug concentrations in the body, providing meaningful pharmacokinetic parameters. These models are categorized into compartment, physiological, and distributed parameter models.
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...
Pharmacokinetic Models: Overview01:20

Pharmacokinetic Models: Overview

Pharmacokinetic models utilize mathematical analysis to achieve a detailed quantitative understanding of a drug's life cycle within the body. They are instrumental in simulating a drug's pharmacokinetic parameters, predicting drug concentrations over time, optimizing dosage regimens, linking concentrations with pharmacologic activity, and estimating potential toxicity.
There are three primary types of models: empirical, compartment, and physiological. Empirical models, with minimal assumptions,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bound Ligand Conformer Revealed by Flexible Structure Alignment in Absence of Crystal Structures: Indirect Drug Design Probed for HIV-1 Protease Inhibitors.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2015
Same author

Rubredoxin Function: Redox Behavior from Electrostatics.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2015
Same author

mFES: A Robust Molecular Finite Element Solver for Electrostatic Energy Computations.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2015
Same author

Electrostatic pKa computations in proteins: role of internal cavities.

Proteins·2011
Same author

Charge transport in the ClC-type chloride-proton anti-porter from Escherichia coli.

The Journal of biological chemistry·2010
Same author

Understanding properties of cofactors in proteins: redox potentials of synthetic cytochromes b.

Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry·2010

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Computational Prediction of Amino Acid Preferences of Potentially Multispecific Peptide-Binding Domains Involved in Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Computational Prediction of Amino Acid Preferences of Potentially Multispecific Peptide-Binding Domains Involved in Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

Improved pK(a) prediction: combining empirical and semimicroscopic methods.

Gernot Kieseritzky1, E W Knapp

  • 1Freie Universität Berlin, Institute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Fabeckstr. 36a, Berlin 14195, Germany.

Journal of Computational Chemistry
|May 13, 2008
PubMed
Summary

This study compared three methods for calculating protein pK(a) values, finding that a consensus approach combining methods yielded the most accurate predictions for ionizable residues.

More Related Videos

A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English
14:34

A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English

Published on: April 3, 2026

An Integrated System to Remotely Trigger Intracellular Signal Transduction by Upconversion Nanoparticle-mediated Kinase Photoactivation
11:20

An Integrated System to Remotely Trigger Intracellular Signal Transduction by Upconversion Nanoparticle-mediated Kinase Photoactivation

Published on: August 30, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Computational Prediction of Amino Acid Preferences of Potentially Multispecific Peptide-Binding Domains Involved in Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Computational Prediction of Amino Acid Preferences of Potentially Multispecific Peptide-Binding Domains Involved in Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English
14:34

A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English

Published on: April 3, 2026

An Integrated System to Remotely Trigger Intracellular Signal Transduction by Upconversion Nanoparticle-mediated Kinase Photoactivation
11:20

An Integrated System to Remotely Trigger Intracellular Signal Transduction by Upconversion Nanoparticle-mediated Kinase Photoactivation

Published on: August 30, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Biophysics
  • Protein science

Background:

  • Accurate prediction of ionizable residue pK(a) values is crucial for understanding protein function and interactions.
  • Existing computational methods vary in their accuracy and applicability to different types of pK(a) shifts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the accuracy of three distinct computational methods (KBPLUS, PROPKA, PKAcal) for predicting experimentally determined protein pK(a) values.
  • To evaluate the performance of these methods across different ranges of experimental pK(a) shifts.
  • To investigate the potential of consensus approaches for improving pK(a) prediction accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Calculation of 171 experimentally known pK(a) values for ionizable residues in 15 proteins using KBPLUS (continuum electrostatic model), PROPKA (empirical, physically motivated), and PKAcal (empirical function).
  • Comparison of computed pK(a) values against experimental data using root mean square deviation (RMSD).
  • Analysis of method performance based on weakly and strongly shifted experimental pK(a) values.
  • Testing of consensus strategies combining predictions from multiple methods.

Main Results:

  • PROPKA demonstrated the highest overall accuracy in reproducing experimental pK(a) values.
  • PROPKA's accuracy was superior for weakly shifted pK(a) values, while KBPLUS performed comparably for strongly shifted values.
  • PKAcal showed poor accuracy for strongly shifted pK(a) values but performed similarly to PROPKA for weakly shifted values.
  • Consensus approaches generally improved prediction accuracy compared to individual methods.

Conclusions:

  • No single method consistently outperformed others across all pK(a) shift ranges.
  • Consensus approaches offer a robust strategy for enhancing the accuracy of protein pK(a) predictions.
  • Combining multiple computational methods is recommended for reliable pK(a) value determination in protein studies.