Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Language beyond action.

Ivan Toni1, Floris P de Lange, Matthijs L Noordzij

  • 1F.C. Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Radboud University Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Journal of Physiology, Paris
|May 13, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dynamic competition between selective attention and spatial prediction during visual search.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same author

Inter-subject correlations and their behavioral associations vary across movies: Implications for generalizability.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

An open-access multi-site fMRI dataset for investigating conscious visual perception.

Scientific data·2026
Same author

Attention in the wild: balancing flexibility and stability.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same author

Stimulus dependencies-rather than next-word prediction-can explain pre-onset brain encoding in naturalistic listening designs.

eLife·2026
Same author

Improving Emotion Control in Social Anxiety by Targeting Rhythmic Brain Circuits.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Role of synchronized physiological and interpersonal rhythms in typical and atypical development.

Journal of physiology, Paris·2017
Same journal

Suicide attempts in children and adolescents: The place of clock genes and early rhythm dysfunction.

Journal of physiology, Paris·2017
Same journal

Editorial.

Journal of physiology, Paris·2017
Same journal

Dyssynchrony and perinatal psychopathology impact of child disease on parents-child interactions, the paradigm of Prader Willi syndrom.

Journal of physiology, Paris·2017
Same journal

Key considerations in designing a speech brain-computer interface.

Journal of physiology, Paris·2017
Same journal

Links between early child maltreatment, mental disorders, and cortisol secretion anomalies.

Journal of physiology, Paris·2017
See all related articles

Mirror neurons offer insights into cognitive functions, but evidence doesn't support their role in explaining language and communication. Their explanatory power for these complex human abilities is limited.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Linguistics

Background:

  • Mirror neurons, discovered in macaques and found in humans, have been proposed as a neurobiological basis for various cognitive functions.
  • Automatic sensorimotor resonance, linked to mirror neurons, has been implicated in imitation, apraxia, autism, and schizophrenia.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically appraise claims linking language and the motor system via mirror neuron activity.
  • To evaluate whether language comprehension, language evolution, and human communication are adequately explained by automatic sensorimotor resonances.

Main Methods:

  • Critical review and theoretical appraisal of existing empirical evidence.
  • Analysis of claims regarding the motor system's role in language comprehension and evolution.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The available empirical evidence does not sufficiently support the claims that the motor system is required for language comprehension.
  • The theoretical scope of sensorimotor resonance is insufficient to explain crucial features of language and communication.

Conclusions:

  • While mirror neurons are significant, their explanatory power for language and communication is limited.
  • Current evidence does not support the integration of language and communication within the motor system based on mirror neuron theories.