Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital
Published on: June 11, 2012
Prospective detection of hyperglycemia in critically ill children using continuous glucose monitoring
Holley F Allen1, Alyssa Rake, Marybeth Roy
1Baystate Children's Hospital. holley.allen@bhs.org
Insights
Continuous glucose monitoring reveals significant hyperglycemia in critically ill children, often missed by standard lab tests. This highlights the need for advanced monitoring in pediatric intensive care units.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Intensive Care
- Endocrinology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Hyperglycemia is common in critically ill children.
- Intermittent laboratory monitoring may underestimate glucose levels.
Purpose of the Study:
- Evaluate hyperglycemia extent in non-diabetic pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM).
- Compare CGM's hyperglycemia detection with intermittent laboratory monitoring.
Main Methods:
- Prospective observational study in a 10-bed PICU.
- 20 non-diabetic children (aged 1-18) requiring >2 days of intensive care.
- Subcutaneous CGM for 72 hours, with glucose levels compared to laboratory values.
Main Results:
- 16,337 sensor glucose readings analyzed over a mean of 68 hours per patient.
- 43% of readings exceeded 125 mg/dL, 27.2% exceeded 140 mg/dL, and 4.0% exceeded 200 mg/dL.
- Laboratory monitoring detected hyperglycemia less frequently and missed significant hyperglycemic periods.
Conclusions:
- Non-diabetic children in the PICU experience significant hyperglycemia.
- Intermittent laboratory monitoring may underestimate the prevalence and duration of hyperglycemia in this population.
Objective:
To evaluate the extent of hyperglycemia in nondiabetic children admitted to a pediatric intensive care unit using an interstitial continuous glucose monitor, and to compare the ability of this interstitial continuous glucose monitoring system to detect hyperglycemia with that of intermittent laboratory monitoring.
Design:
Prospective observational study.
Setting:
Ten-bed pediatric intensive care unit in an academic referral medical center in western Massachusetts.
Patients:
A convenience sample of 20 nondiabetic children, aged 1-18, anticipated to require intensive care >2 days.
Interventions:
Placement of a subcutaneous continuous glucose monitor for 72 hrs with a subsequent second sensor placed if the patient and family agreed. Glucose levels were compared with laboratory glucose values.
Measurements And Main Results:
Elevated glucose levels were revealed by 16,337 sensor glucose readings over a mean of 68 +/- 5.2 hrs per patient. Forty-three percent of readings were >125 mg/dL (6.9 mmol/L), 27.2% were >140 mg/dL (7.8 mmol/L), and 4.0% were >200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L). Laboratory glucose measurements demonstrated hyperglycemia less frequently and missed significant periods of hyperglycemia.
Conclusions:
Significant hyperglycemia is present in pediatric intensive care patients and may be underestimated by intermittent laboratory monitoring.
Related Concept Videos
Hypoglycemia and Glucagon
Hyperglycemia
Hypoglycemia
Hyperosmolar Hyperglycemic State
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Type II Diabetes Mellitus III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnosis
