Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
Published on: July 3, 2020
Optimal growth modeling
Shane Reeves1, Ira M Bernstein
1Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Women's Health Care Service, Fletcher Allen Health Care, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT, USA.
Insights
Establishing accurate fetal growth standards is crucial for identifying high-risk pregnancies and improving perinatal outcomes. Population-specific data and novel approaches combining birth weights and in-utero growth patterns enhance prediction of adverse outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Perinatal Medicine
- Maternal-Fetal Medicine
- Neonatology
Background:
- Abnormal fetal growth is linked to severe perinatal complications, including preterm birth, stillbirth, and neonatal mortality.
- Existing fetal growth standards may lack accuracy due to generalized data or flawed methodologies (e.g., reliance solely on neonatal birth weights or clinical ultrasound data).
- Population-specific growth standards are essential as optimal birth weights for neonatal outcomes vary across different populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of various fetal growth standards in identifying fetuses at risk for adverse perinatal outcomes.
- To explore novel approaches for defining normal intrauterine growth that integrate multiple data points.
- To compare the predictive performance of different growth standards for adverse perinatal outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Review and analysis of existing literature on fetal growth standards.
- Examination of methods combining term birth weights and in-utero growth patterns.
- Assessment of the performance of different growth standards in predicting poor perinatal outcomes.
Main Results:
- Generalized growth curves may be less applicable than population-specific standards.
- Standards based solely on neonatal birth weights or clinical ultrasound data have limitations.
- Novel approaches integrating birth weights and in-utero growth patterns show promise for improved accuracy.
Conclusions:
- Accurate fetal growth standards are vital for optimizing perinatal care and outcomes.
- Population-specific data and integrated growth pattern analysis are key to developing superior growth standards.
- Further research into novel growth characterization methods is needed to enhance the prediction of adverse perinatal outcomes.
Abstract:
Abnormal fetal growth is associated with preterm birth, stillbirth, neonatal death, respiratory distress syndrome, and necrotizing enterocolitis. An optimal fetal growth standard would be one that most correctly identifies the fetus at risk for poor perinatal outcome. A growth standard that is created using population-specific data is more applicable than generalized growth curves since there is evidence that optimal neonatal outcome is achieved at different birth weights in different populations. The development of fetal growth standards based exclusively on neonatal birth weights is flawed as fetal growth restriction is associated with preterm delivery. Likewise, employing clinically derived ultrasound standards for term gestations would include a population that is more likely to have abnormal growth. Novel approaches to defining normal intrauterine growth combine birth weights at term and fetal growth patterns in-utero to create growth curves useful in defining the normal intrauterine growth experience. This review examines the performance of a variety of the growth characterizing standards that have been employed to define abnormal growth and examines their performance in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome.
Related Concept Videos
Modeling with Differential Equations
Exponential Equations for Modeling Growth
Growth Models with Integration: Problem Solving
Population Growth
Exponential Equations with Logarithms: Problem Solving
Optimal Foraging
