Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Diagnosis of Musculus Gastrocnemius Tightness - Key Factors for the Clinical Examination
Published on: July 7, 2016
Force-displacement relationship during anteroposterior mobilization of the ankle joint
Marcelo V S de Souza1, Claudia Venturini, Luciana M Teixeira
1Physical therapist; Motion Analysis Laboratory, Physical Therapy Department, School of Physical Education, Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Objective:
The purpose of this study was to determinate the correlation between force and displacement during passive anteroposterior mobilization of the talus and the effect of this treatment technique on ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM).
Methods:
This is an exploratory, methodological study. Maitland grades III and IV mobilization were applied on the right ankle of 25 healthy subjects (mean age +/- standard deviation, 25.08 +/- 3.01 years) by 2 randomized raters (A and B). Applied forces were measured using a small force plate and displayed for the rater on a computer monitor. Linear displacement of the ankle joint was quantified by a motion analysis system. Synchronization of these 2 systems was obtained by software. Dorsiflexion active ROM, before and after mobilization, was assessed using a biplane goniometer. Statistical analysis was performed using the Pearson correlation coefficient for force and displacement variables and the paired t test to compare dorsiflexion ROM mean values.
Results:
A fair positive correlation was found between force range and displacement (r = 0.370; P = .049, 1-tailed), and a fair negative correlation was found between minimum forces and displacement (r = 0.404; P = .035, 1-tailed), only for rater A data. Significant increase in dorsiflexion was found in the right ankle (P = .035), comparing ROM before and after mobilization, which did not occur in the left ankle.
Conclusions:
These data do not support a linear force-displacement relationship during Maitland grades III and IV passive joint mobilization, although they confirmed an increase in ankle dorsiflexion ROM immediately after joint mobilization. The use of visual feedback may increase interrater reliability of forces applied during ankle joint mobilization.
Related Concept Videos
Ankle Joint
Method of Joints: Problem Solving II
Space Trusses: Problem Solving
Consider a tripod consisting of a tetrahedral space truss with a ball-and-socket joint at C. Suppose the height and lengths of the horizontal and vertical...
Method of Joints: Problem Solving I
Equation of Motion: General Plane motion - Problem Solving
The friction between the roller and the ground is characterized by two coefficients. The static friction coefficient is 0.15, while the kinetic friction coefficient is 0.1. These values are crucial in understanding the interaction between...
Machines: Problem Solving II

