Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Instruction effects in task switching.

Iring Koch1

  • 1RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany. koch@psych.rwth-aachen.de

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|May 21, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Contrasting cognitive control in the Simon and spatial Stroop tasks regarding their interference with the control of standing balance.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Exploring age-related inhibitory deficits in auditory attention: Evidence from attention switching.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Visual-manual response selection produces dual-task interference in auditory-verbal memory encoding.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Opposite effects of interruption frequency on performance in interrupted and uninterrupted multistep task.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Huh, what did they say again? The influence of task interruption position and workload on auditory-verbal memory performance.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2026
Same author

Dissociating Task Selection and Response Selection in Dual-Task Contexts: Evidence from a Novel Trial-by-Trial Analysis of Temporal Overlap between Tasks.

Journal of cognition·2026
Same journal

Mind wandering during first- and foreign-language reading.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Lexical word processing is unaffected by rapid invisible frequency tagging in reading: Evidence from eye movements.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Anxiety modulates voluntary attentional orienting to emotional gaze cues: Eye movements for pro- and anti-saccades.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Faster key-press responses to front vowels than back vowels when matching heard vowels with represented vowels.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Testing the interleaving effect without response bias: A forced-choice reevaluation of Kornell and Bjork (2008).

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

The impact of social interaction on abstract concepts.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
See all related articles

Instructions significantly improve task preparation for predictable repetitions by enhancing working memory monitoring. This effect was not observed in task switches, indicating task-specific preparation strategies.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Factors

Background:

  • Sequential task preparation is crucial for efficient cognitive performance.
  • Understanding how instructions influence preparation, especially in predictable vs. unpredictable task transitions, is key.
  • Previous research highlights the role of predictability in task switching, but the specific impact of instructions remains debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of explicit instructions on sequential task preparation.
  • To differentiate the effects of instructions on predictable task repetitions versus task switches.
  • To determine whether preparation benefits are task-specific or switch-specific.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a cuing paradigm involving three tasks with predictable transitions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Manipulated task predictability (predictable vs. random) and preparation time (cue-stimulus interval, CSI).
  • Conducted two experiments varying predictability and CSI to isolate instruction effects.

    • Main Results:

    • Clear instruction effects were observed, but primarily for predictable task repetitions.
    • Predictability significantly influenced preparation in repetitions, determining upcoming task identity.
    • Instruction effects were minimal and not modulated by predictability in task switches.

    Conclusions:

    • Intentional processes, guided by instructions, enhance predictability benefits in task repetitions.
    • Preparation appears to be predominantly task-specific rather than switch-specific.
    • Working memory monitoring likely plays a role in maintaining task activation during repetitions.