Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2026

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
Published on: September 20, 2018
Should epidemiologists always publish their results? Yes, almost always
1Department of Epidemiology, UCLA School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095-1772, USA. kheifets@ucla.edu
Abstract:
Advances in science are made when the scientific community shares and debates ideas and results openly. In this process there will be controversy and strong disagreements. No study is perfect: many suffer from inconsistencies, methodologic problems, and novel findings that often have very low prior probabilities. An open debate is a healthy and necessary part of this process and we should not seek to hide or avoid a constructive discussion by reporting selectively.
Related Concept Videos
Introduction to Epidemiology
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Steps in Outbreak Investigation
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.
Statistical Software for Data Analysis and Clinical Trials